These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18196699)

  • 1. Learning sequence of views of three-dimensional objects: the effect of temporal coherence on object memory.
    Liu T
    Perception; 2007; 36(9):1320-33. PubMed ID: 18196699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The visual representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects.
    Kourtzi Z; Shiffrar M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):265-92. PubMed ID: 10504884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects.
    Lawson R
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1170-81. PubMed ID: 15813498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatiotemporal information during unsupervised learning enhances viewpoint invariant object recognition.
    Tian M; Grill-Spector K
    J Vis; 2015; 15(6):7. PubMed ID: 26024454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of sequence order in determining view canonicality for novel wire-frame objects.
    Balas BJ; Sinha P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):712-23. PubMed ID: 19429954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Invariant object recognition in the visual system with novel views of 3D objects.
    Stringer SM; Rolls ET
    Neural Comput; 2002 Nov; 14(11):2585-96. PubMed ID: 12433291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects.
    Flombaum JI; Scholl BJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):840-53. PubMed ID: 16846283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How does the brain rapidly learn and reorganize view-invariant and position-invariant object representations in the inferotemporal cortex?
    Cao Y; Grossberg S; Markowitz J
    Neural Netw; 2011 Dec; 24(10):1050-61. PubMed ID: 21596523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of symmetry and repetition in one and two objects. Structures versus strategies.
    Koning A; Wagemans J
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 19261573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Encoding 'regular' and 'random' sequences of views of novel three-dimensional objects.
    Harman KL; Humphrey GK
    Perception; 1999; 28(5):601-15. PubMed ID: 10664756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition.
    Vetter T; Poggio T; Bülthoff HH
    Curr Biol; 1994 Jan; 4(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7922306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does aging influence object-location and name-location binding during a visual short-term memory task?
    Sapkota RP; van der Linde I; Pardhan S
    Aging Ment Health; 2020 Jan; 24(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 30588846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.
    Lawson R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):221-45. PubMed ID: 10504882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stereo disparity facilitates view generalization during shape recognition for solid multipart objects.
    Cristino F; Davitt L; Hayward WG; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(12):2419-36. PubMed ID: 25679983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A; Reid SL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Jun; 130(2):238-55. PubMed ID: 11409102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No symmetry advantage when object matching involves accidental viewpoints.
    Koning A; van Lier R
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jan; 70(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 15480756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.
    Lawson R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):911-30. PubMed ID: 19653738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning the 3-D structure of objects from 2-D views depends on shape, not format.
    Tian M; Yamins D; Grill-Spector K
    J Vis; 2016 May; 16(7):7. PubMed ID: 27153196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.