878 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18196789)
1. Empirical electro-optical and x-ray performance evaluation of CMOS active pixels sensor for low dose, high resolution x-ray medical imaging.
Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Royle G; Blue A; Liang HX; Clark A; Prydderch M; Turchetta R; Speller R
Med Phys; 2007 Dec; 34(12):4612-25. PubMed ID: 18196789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Signal and noise transfer properties of CMOS based active pixel flat panel imager coupled to structured CsI:Tl.
Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Blakesley J; Olivo A; Speller RD
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 19235380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistor active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Kanicki J
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091902. PubMed ID: 25186389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional cascaded system analysis of a 50 µm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Vassiljev N; Konstantinidis AC; Speller RD; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1994-2017. PubMed ID: 28072394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling and evaluation of a high-resolution CMOS detector for cone-beam CT of the extremities.
Cao Q; Sisniega A; Brehler M; Stayman JW; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH; Zbijewski W
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):114-130. PubMed ID: 29095489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physical characterization and performance comparison of active- and passive-pixel CMOS detectors for mammography.
Elbakri IA; McIntosh BJ; Rickey DW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1743-55. PubMed ID: 19242050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. X-ray imaging performance of scintillator-filled silicon pore arrays.
Simon M; Engel KJ; Menser B; Badel X; Linnros J
Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):968-81. PubMed ID: 18404933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Segmented crystalline scintillators: empirical and theoretical investigation of a high quantum efficiency EPID based on an initial engineering prototype CsI(TI) detector.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Perna L
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1053-66. PubMed ID: 16696482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis.
Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. System performance of a prototype flat-panel imager operated under mammographic conditions.
Jee KW; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1874-90. PubMed ID: 12906206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector.
Sheth NM; Uneri A; Helm PA; Zbijewski W; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3053-3066. PubMed ID: 35363391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of a novel wafer scale CMOS active pixel sensor for bio-medical imaging.
Esposito M; Anaxagoras T; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Speller RD; Evans PM; Allinson NM; Wells K
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(13):3533-54. PubMed ID: 24909098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. X-ray imaging performance of structured cesium iodide scintillators.
Zhao W; Ristic G; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2594-605. PubMed ID: 15487742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Theoretical investigation of the noise performance of active pixel imaging arrays based on polycrystalline silicon thin film transistors.
Koniczek M; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Liang AK; Zhao Q
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3491-3503. PubMed ID: 28376261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 50 μm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Anaxagoras T; Speller RD; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):8977-9001. PubMed ID: 26540090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology.
Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Boudry JM; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9029542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
