295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18196793)
41. Detective quantum efficiency of photon-counting x-ray detectors.
Tanguay J; Yun S; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):491-509. PubMed ID: 25563288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Comparison of basic imaging properties for digital radiographic systems based on a direct conversion type of flat panel detector].
Sakai S; Katayama R; Morishita J; Sakaguchi T; Ohkubo S; Maeda T; Hayabuchi N
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Jan; 64(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18311020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: frequency-dependent Swank noise.
Hajdok G; Battista JJ; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3194-204. PubMed ID: 18697544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium: theoretical feasibility of the liquid crystal light valve for radiography.
Rieppo PK; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1279-91. PubMed ID: 9284252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Development of high quantum efficiency flat panel detectors for portal imaging: intrinsic spatial resolution.
Pang G; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2274-85. PubMed ID: 12408302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Physical and psychophysical characterization of a novel clinical system for digital mammography.
Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Golinelli P; Acchiappati D; Gallo E
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5139-48. PubMed ID: 19994524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Digital radiography using amorphous selenium: photoconductively activated switch (PAS) readout system.
Reznik N; Komljenovic PT; Germann S; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):1039-50. PubMed ID: 18404939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
Samant SS; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Is the image quality of conventional chest radiography obtained from a two-layer flat panel detector affected by the internal structure of the detector?
Takarabe S; Kuramoto T; Shibayama Y; Yamasaki Y; Kitamura Y; Yoshikawa H; Kato T
Phys Med; 2022 Mar; 95():176-181. PubMed ID: 35219067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.
Floyd CE; Warp RJ; Dobbins JT; Chotas HG; Baydush AH; Vargas-Voracek R; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 11230640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Flat-panel detectors: how much better are they?
Seibert JA
Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):173-81. PubMed ID: 16862412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of a hybrid direct-indirect active matrix flat-panel imager using Monte Carlo simulation.
Dow S; Howansky A; Lubinsky AR; Zhao W
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2020 May; 7(3):033501. PubMed ID: 32411813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors.
Richard S; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B
Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1397-413. PubMed ID: 15984691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Suekane K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.
Granfors PR; Aufrichtig R; Possin GE; Giambattista BW; Huang ZS; Liu J; Ma B
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2715-26. PubMed ID: 14596310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Measured and calculated K-fluorescence effects on the MTF of an amorphous-selenium based CCD x-ray detector.
Hunter DM; Belev G; Kasap S; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):608-22. PubMed ID: 22320770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Photon counting performance of amorphous selenium and its dependence on detector structure.
Stavro J; Goldan AH; Zhao W
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2018 Oct; 5(4):043502. PubMed ID: 30840737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
