165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18196803)
1. Ultrasonic measurements of breast viscoelasticity.
Sridhar M; Insana MF
Med Phys; 2007 Dec; 34(12):4757-67. PubMed ID: 18196803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Elasticity imaging of polymeric media.
Sridhar M; Liu J; Insana MF
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):259-72. PubMed ID: 17408331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Viscoelasticity imaging using ultrasound: parameters and error analysis.
Sridhar M; Liu J; Insana MF
Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2425-43. PubMed ID: 17440244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual Breast Quasi-static Elastography (VBQE).
Rosen D; Wang Y; Jiang J
Ultrason Imaging; 2017 Mar; 39(2):108-125. PubMed ID: 27488348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated In Vivo Sub-Hertz Analysis of Viscoelasticity (SAVE) for Evaluation of Breast Lesions.
Bayat M; Nabavizadeh A; Kumar V; Gregory A; Insana M; Alizad A; Fatemi M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Oct; 65(10):2237-2247. PubMed ID: 29989938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Poro-viscoelastic behavior of gelatin hydrogels under compression-implications for bioelasticity imaging.
Kalyanam S; Yapp RD; Insana MF
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Aug; 131(8):081005. PubMed ID: 19604017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parametric imaging of viscoelasticity using optical coherence elastography.
Wijesinghe P; McLaughlin RA; Sampson DD; Kennedy BF
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(6):2293-307. PubMed ID: 25715798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fractional derivative models for ultrasonic characterization of polymer and breast tissue viscoelasticity.
Coussot C; Kalyanam S; Yapp R; Insana MF
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Apr; 56(4):715-26. PubMed ID: 19406700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasonic viscoelasticity imaging of nonpalpable breast tumors: preliminary results.
Qiu Y; Sridhar M; Tsou JK; Lindfors KK; Insana MF
Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1526-33. PubMed ID: 19000869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry.
Bausch AR; Ziemann F; Boulbitch AA; Jacobson K; Sackmann E
Biophys J; 1998 Oct; 75(4):2038-49. PubMed ID: 9746546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonlinear viscoelastic characterization of bovine trabecular bone.
Manda K; Wallace RJ; Xie S; Levrero-Florencio F; Pankaj P
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Feb; 16(1):173-189. PubMed ID: 27440127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-parameter Sub-Hertz Analysis of Viscoelasticity With a Quality Metric for Differentiation of Breast Masses.
Bayat M; Nabavizadeh A; Nayak R; Webb JM; Gregory AV; Meixner DD; Fazzio RT; Insana MF; Alizad A; Fatemi M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3393-3403. PubMed ID: 32917470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Linear viscoelasticity - bone volume fraction relationships of bovine trabecular bone.
Manda K; Xie S; Wallace RJ; Levrero-Florencio F; Pankaj P
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Dec; 15(6):1631-1640. PubMed ID: 27090522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Bayesian approach for characterization of soft tissue viscoelasticity in acoustic radiation force imaging.
Zhao X; Pelegri AA
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Apr; 32(4):e02741. PubMed ID: 26255624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of temporal acquisition parameters on image quality of strain time constant elastography.
Nair S; Varghese J; Chaudhry A; Righetti R
Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Apr; 37(2):87-100. PubMed ID: 24942645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A nonlinear anisotropic viscoelastic model for the tensile behavior of the corneal stroma.
Nguyen TD; Jones RE; Boyce BL
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Aug; 130(4):041020. PubMed ID: 18601462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of a Pixel-to-Pixel Curve-Fitting Method for Poroelastography Imaging.
Galaz BA; Acevedo RH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):309-322. PubMed ID: 27765386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with virtual touch tissue quantification: measurements of normal breast tissue and dependence on the degree of pre-compression.
Wojcinski S; Brandhorst K; Sadigh G; Hillemanns P; Degenhardt F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2226-32. PubMed ID: 24035624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ramp-Creep Ultrasound Viscoelastography for Measuring Viscoelastic Parameters of Materials.
Lin CY
Materials (Basel); 2020 Aug; 13(16):. PubMed ID: 32823881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ex vivo and in vivo assessment of the non-linearity of elasticity properties of breast tissues for quantitative strain elastography.
Umemoto T; Ueno E; Matsumura T; Yamakawa M; Bando H; Mitake T; Shiina T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1755-68. PubMed ID: 24802305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
