These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18197442)

  • 1. Classification of dog barks: a machine learning approach.
    Molnár C; Kaplan F; Roy P; Pachet F; Pongrácz P; Dóka A; Miklósi A
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Jul; 11(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 18197442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dogs discriminate between barks: the effect of context and identity of the caller.
    Molnár C; Pongrácz P; Faragó T; Dóka A; Miklósi A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 19596426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can humans discriminate between dogs on the base of the acoustic parameters of barks?
    Molnár C; Pongrácz P; Dóka A; Miklósi A
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jul; 73(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 16678361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations.
    Pongrácz P; Molnár C; Miklósi A; Csányi V
    J Comp Psychol; 2005 May; 119(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 15982157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing supervised learning methods for classifying sex, age, context and individual Mudi dogs from barking.
    Larrañaga A; Bielza C; Pongrácz P; Faragó T; Bálint A; Larrañaga P
    Anim Cogn; 2015 Mar; 18(2):405-21. PubMed ID: 25308549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study on feature analysis for musical instrument classification.
    Deng JD; Simmermacher C; Cranefield S
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2008 Apr; 38(2):429-38. PubMed ID: 18348925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seeing with ears: Sightless humans' perception of dog bark provides a test for structural rules in vocal communication.
    Molnár C; Pongrácz P; Miklósi A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):1004-13. PubMed ID: 19760535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic censusing using automatic vocalization classification and identity recognition.
    Adi K; Johnson MT; Osiejuk TS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):874-83. PubMed ID: 20136210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Barking in family dogs: an ethological approach.
    Pongrácz P; Molnár C; Miklósi A
    Vet J; 2010 Feb; 183(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 19181546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel sound production through contingency learning in the Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens).
    Schusterman RJ; Reichmuth C
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Apr; 11(2):319-27. PubMed ID: 18038276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The harmonic-to-noise ratio applied to dog barks.
    Riede T; Herzel H; Hammerschmidt K; Brunnberg L; Tembrock G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2191-7. PubMed ID: 11681395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A tool for real-time acoustic species identification of delphinid whistles.
    Oswald JN; Rankin S; Barlow J; Lammers MO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):587-95. PubMed ID: 17614515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related differences in the acoustic characteristics of male leopard seals, Hydrurga leptonyx.
    Rogers TL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):596-605. PubMed ID: 17614516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Barking and mobbing.
    Lord K; Feinstein M; Coppinger R
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jul; 81(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 19520235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphing rhesus monkey vocalizations.
    Chakladar S; Logothetis NK; Petkov CI
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 May; 170(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 18289695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classification of mysticete sounds using machine learning techniques.
    Halkias XC; Paris S; Glotin H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3496-505. PubMed ID: 24180760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic classification of multiple simultaneous bird species: a multi-instance multi-label approach.
    Briggs F; Lakshminarayanan B; Neal L; Fern XZ; Raich R; Hadley SJ; Hadley AS; Betts MG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4640-50. PubMed ID: 22712937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finding good acoustic features for parrot vocalizations: the feature generation approach.
    Giret N; Roy P; Albert A; Pachet F; Kreutzer M; Bovet D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):1089-99. PubMed ID: 21361465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of experience and context on 50-kHz vocalizations in rats.
    Wöhr M; Houx B; Schwarting RK; Spruijt B
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Mar; 93(4-5):766-76. PubMed ID: 18191963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hunting dogs bark differently when they encounter different animal species.
    Policht R; Matějka O; Benediktová K; Adámková J; Hart V
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17407. PubMed ID: 34556674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.