165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18197633)
1. Evaluation of maximum likelihood procedures to estimate left censored observations.
Jain RB; Caudill SP; Wang RY; Monsell E
Anal Chem; 2008 Feb; 80(4):1124-32. PubMed ID: 18197633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Limitations of maximum likelihood estimation procedures when a majority of the observations are below the limit of detection.
Jain RB; Wang RY
Anal Chem; 2008 Jun; 80(12):4767-72. PubMed ID: 18489183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
Hewett P; Ganser GH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
Ganser GH; Hewett P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximum likelihood estimates of mean and variance of occupation radiation doses subjected to minimum detection levels.
Datta D; Singh S; Johnson BE; Kushwaha HS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 18083720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating mean exposures from censored data: exposure to benzene in the Australian petroleum industry.
Glass DC; Gray CN
Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jun; 45(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 11378148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geometric mean estimation from pooled samples.
Caudill SP; Turner WE; Patterson DG
Chemosphere; 2007 Sep; 69(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 17618673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Model-based imputation approach for data analysis in the presence of non-detects.
Krishnamoorthy K; Mallick A; Mathew T
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Apr; 53(3):249-63. PubMed ID: 19181626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation.
Waksman JA
Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 17133631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of censored exposure data by constrained maximization of the Shapiro-Wilk W statistic.
Flynn MR
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 19955326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nearly unbiased estimators for the three-parameter Weibull distribution with greater efficiency than the iterative likelihood method.
Cousineau D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):167-91. PubMed ID: 18177546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the intraclass correlation parameter for binary data.
Saha KK; Paul SR
Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3497-512. PubMed ID: 16007569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating variance parameters from multivariate normal variables subject to limit of detection: MLE, REML, or Bayesian approaches?
Nie L; Chu H; Feng S
Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2605-16. PubMed ID: 19598183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of observations below detection limit for model calibration.
LeFrancois M; Poeter E
Ground Water; 2009; 47(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 19016900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of lognormally distributed exposure data with repeated measures and values below the limit of detection using SAS.
Jin Y; Hein MJ; Deddens JA; Hines CJ
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jan; 55(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 21177260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of statistical approaches for analyzing physician-randomized quality improvement interventions.
Stedman MR; Gagnon DR; Lew RA; Solomon DH; Brookhart MA
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 18571476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An investigation of the impact of left-censored soil contamination data on the uncertainty of descriptive statistical parameters.
Shoari N; Dubé JS
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2623-2631. PubMed ID: 26946089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of methods for analyzing left-censored occupational exposure data.
Huynh T; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Monteiro J; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Nov; 58(9):1126-42. PubMed ID: 25261453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing the effects of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection in evaluating screening mammography: a censored bivariate data approach.
Mahnken JD; Chan W; Freeman DH; Freeman JL
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):643-63. PubMed ID: 18445697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
