143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18198064)
1. Factors associated with a successful external cephalic version in the early ECV trial.
Hutton EK; Saunders CA; Tu M; Stoll K; Berkowitz J; Early External Cephalic Version Trial Collaborators Group
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Jan; 30(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 18198064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses.
Hutton EK; Simioni JC; Thabane L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Aug; 96(8):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28449212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital.
Mowat A; Gardener G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Feb; 54(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 24359099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives.
Beuckens A; Rijnders M; Verburgt-Doeleman GH; Rijninks-van Driel GC; Thorpe J; Hutton EK
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 25639281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for external cephalic version.
Velzel J; Schuit E; Vlemmix F; Molkenboer JFM; Van der Post JAM; Mol BW; Kok M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Sep; 228():137-142. PubMed ID: 29940417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical hypnosis before external cephalic version.
Reinhard J; Heinrich TM; Reitter A; Herrmann E; Smart W; Louwen F
Am J Clin Hypn; 2012 Oct; 55(2):184-92. PubMed ID: 23189523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Introducing routine external cephalic version for the management of the malpresenting fetus near term.
Devendra K
Med J Malaysia; 2002 Dec; 57(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 12733170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cord accident after external cephalic version: Reality or mostly myth?].
Boujenah J; Fleury C; Pharisien I; Benbara A; Tigaizin A; Bricou A; Carbillon L
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Jan; 45(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 28238321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.
Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery.
Salzer L; Nagar R; Melamed N; Wiznitzer A; Peled Y; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jan; 28(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 24593778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal heart rate abnormalities during and after external cephalic version: Which fetuses are at risk and how are they delivered?
Kuppens SM; Smailbegovic I; Houterman S; de Leeuw I; Hasaart TH
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):363. PubMed ID: 29041923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Matched cohort study of external cephalic version in women with previous cesarean delivery.
Keepanasseril A; Anand K; Soundara Raghavan S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 138(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 28380246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External cephalic version with salbutamol - success rate and predictors of success.
Tasnim N; Mahmud G; Khurshid M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Feb; 19(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 19208311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Cost Implications in Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia of Early Versus Delayed External Cephalic Version in the Early External Cephalic Version 2 (EECV2) Trial.
Ahmed RJ; Gafni A; Hutton EK;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Mar; 38(3):235-245.e3. PubMed ID: 27106193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Labour Outcomes After Successful External Cephalic Version Compared With Spontaneous Cephalic Version.
Krueger S; Simioni J; Griffith LE; Hutton EK;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jan; 40(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 28780214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External cephalic version beginning at 34 weeks' gestation versus 37 weeks' gestation: a randomized multicenter trial.
Hutton EK; Kaufman K; Hodnett E; Amankwah K; Hewson SA; McKay D; Szalai JP; Hannah ME
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 189(1):245-54. PubMed ID: 12861170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. External cephalic version (ECV): experience in a sub-Saharan African hospital.
Feyi-Waboso PA; Selo-Ojeme CO; Selo-Ojeme DO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 May; 26(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 16753680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls.
Balayla J; Dahdouh EM; Villeneuve S; Boucher M; Gauthier RJ; Audibert F; Fuchs F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 24853490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.
Reinhard J; Sänger N; Hanker L; Reichenbach L; Yuan J; Herrmann E; Louwen F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 23183715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
