BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18198774)

  • 1. Mechanical stability of total hip replacement using pressurization of bone cement during curing: push-out tests in cadaver femora.
    Apostolou CD; Yiannakopoulos CK; Ioannidis TT; Papagelopoulos PJ; Korres D
    Orthopedics; 2007 Dec; 30(12):1028-32. PubMed ID: 18198774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaming versus broaching in cemented hip arthroplasty: mechanical stability in cadaver femora.
    Ioannidis TT; Apostolou CD; Korres DS; Papaletsos I; Gandaifis ND; Panagopoulos CN; Agathocleous PE
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 16156458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does increased cement pressure produce superior femoral component fixation?
    Dozier JK; Harrigan T; Kurtz WH; Hawkins C; Hill R
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 10884210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of calcium phosphate cement-augmented fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
    Elder S; Frankenburg E; Goulet J; Yetkinler D; Poser R; Goldstein S
    J Orthop Trauma; 2000 Aug; 14(6):386-93. PubMed ID: 11001411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel locking screw hip stem to achieve immediate stability in total hip arthroplasty: A biomechanical study.
    Grechenig S; Gueorguiev B; Berner A; Heiss P; Müller M; Nerlich M; Schmitz P
    Injury; 2015 Oct; 46 Suppl 4():S83-7. PubMed ID: 26542871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impacted particulate allograft for femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. In vitro mechanical stability and effects of cement pressurization.
    Berzins A; Sumner DR; Wasielewski RC; Galante JO
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Aug; 11(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 8872566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing of femoral prosthesis insertion during cemented arthroplasty: cement curing and static mechanical strength in an in vivo model.
    Hunt S; Stone C; Seal S
    Can J Surg; 2011 Feb; 54(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 21251430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of cement introduction and pressurization techniques.
    Dunne NJ; Orr JF; Beverland DE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 14982342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial stability of fully and partially cemented femoral stems.
    Claes L; Fiedler S; Ohnmacht M; Duda GN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2000 Dec; 15(10):750-5. PubMed ID: 11050357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cementing of the hip arthroplasty stem increases load-to-failure force: a cadaveric study.
    Klasan A; Bäumlein M; Bliemel C; Putnis SE; Neri T; Schofer MD; Heyse TJ
    Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):445-449. PubMed ID: 31282247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Initial stability of an implanted cement-canal prosthesis. Results in experimental studies on human cadaver femurs].
    Jansson V; Zimmer M; Kühne JH; Sailer FP
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1993; 131(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 8212817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro performance of intramedullary cement restrictors in total hip arthroplasty.
    Heisel C; Norman T; Rupp R; Pritsch M; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
    J Biomech; 2003 Jun; 36(6):835-43. PubMed ID: 12742451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cement viscosity affects the bone-cement interface in total hip arthroplasty.
    Stone JJ; Rand JA; Chiu EK; Grabowski JJ; An KN
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):834-7. PubMed ID: 8893780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.
    Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M
    Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A biomechanical comparison of epiphyseal versus metaphyseal fixed bone-conserving hip arthroplasty.
    Olsen M; Sellan M; Zdero R; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():122-7. PubMed ID: 21543701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressurization and centralization enhance the quality and reproducibility of cement mantles.
    Noble PC; Collier MB; Maltry JA; Kamaric E; Tullos HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):77-89. PubMed ID: 9917593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling the fibrous tissue layer in cemented hip replacements: experimental and finite element methods.
    Waide V; Cristofolini L; Stolk J; Verdonschot N; Boogaard GJ; Toni A
    J Biomech; 2004 Jan; 37(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 14672564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient-specific finite element analysis of femurs with cemented hip implants.
    Katz Y; Lubovsky O; Yosibash Z
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Oct; 58():74-89. PubMed ID: 30053643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Histological findings of the femoral bone after cement removal in hip revision. An experimental study of cadaver femurs with two different cement removal procedures.
    Porsch M; Schmidt J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):199-202. PubMed ID: 12743715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Femoral cement pressurisation for hip arthroplasty in previously fixated hips: an experimental study.
    McMahon SE; Alvi F; Lemon JG; Lovell ME
    Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):352-5. PubMed ID: 19828147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.