BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18198774)

  • 21. Factors influencing pressurization of the femoral canal during cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Maltry JA; Noble PC; Kamaric E; Tullos HS
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Aug; 10(4):492-7. PubMed ID: 8523009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term mechanical stability of the impacted morselized graft-cement interface in total joint replacement: an experimental study in dogs.
    Stamos KG; Karachalios T; Papagelopoulos PJ; Xenakis T; Korres DS; Koroneos E; Hartofilakidis G
    Orthopedics; 2000 Aug; 23(8):809-14. PubMed ID: 10952043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of an expandable stem total hip replacement system.
    Kummer FJ; Strauss EJ; Jaffe WL
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2007; 65(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 17581101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Deformation pattern and load transfer of an uncemented femoral stem with modular necks. An experimental study in human cadaver femurs.
    Enoksen CH; Gjerdet NR; Klaksvik J; Arthursson AJ; Schnell-Husby O; Wik TS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():28-33. PubMed ID: 26785385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanics of a cemented short stem: Standard vs. line-to-line cementation techniques. A biomechanical in-vitro study involving six osteoporotic pairs of human cadaver femurs.
    Kutzner KP; Freitag T; Bieger R; Reichel H; Pfeil J; Ignatius A; Dürselen L
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Feb; 52():86-94. PubMed ID: 29407863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The inadequacy of standard radiographs in detecting flaws in the cement mantle.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Gregg PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1999 Jan; 81(1):167-70. PubMed ID: 10068026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of a polyglycolide lactide cement plug restrictor in total hip arthroplasty.
    Yee AJ; Binnington AG; Hearn T; Protzner K; Fornasier VL; Davey JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Jul; (364):254-66. PubMed ID: 10416416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A quantitative analysis of bone support comparing cementless tapered and distal fixation total hip replacements.
    Howard JL; Hui AJ; Bourne RB; McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ; Rorabeck CH
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Apr; 19(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 15067636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cement microcracks in thin-mantle regions after in vitro fatigue loading.
    Mann KA; Gupta S; Race A; Miller MA; Cleary RJ; Ayers DC
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Aug; 19(5):605-12. PubMed ID: 15284982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro stability of cemented and cementless femoral stems with compaction.
    Chareancholvanich K; Bourgeault CA; Schmidt AH; Gustilo RB; Lew WD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Jan; (394):290-302. PubMed ID: 11795746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of dorsal flanges on fixation of a cemented total hip replacement femoral stem.
    Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 15069149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Primary stability in cementless femoral stems: custom-made versus conventional femoral prosthesis.
    Götze C; Steens W; Vieth V; Poremba C; Claes L; Steinbeck J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 May; 17(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 12034119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acetabular cementing technique in THA--flanged versus unflanged cups, cadaver experiments.
    Parsch D; Diehm C; Schneider S; New A; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Jun; 75(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 15260418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of proximal femoral bone support on the fixation of a press-fit noncemented total hip replacement femoral component.
    Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Borkowski SL; Oakes DA; Reid JJ; Bengs BC
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2013 Jun; 11(1):e26-34. PubMed ID: 23413131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A wax barrier to simulate bone resorption for pre-clinical laboratory models of cemented total hip replacements.
    Cherukuri AR; Miller MA; Race A; Izant TH; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2010 Oct; 43(14):2855-7. PubMed ID: 20643410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Femoral cement pressurization in hip arthroplasty: a laboratory comparison of three techniques.
    Kapoor B; Datir SP; Davis B; Wynn-Jones CH; Maffulli N
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Dec; 75(6):708-12. PubMed ID: 15762260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The cement mantle of femoral hip implants is more influenced by stem-broach sizing than by shape: an in vitro CT analysis of straight Charnley-Kerboul and anatomic Lubinus SPII stems.
    Scheerlinck T; de Mey J; Deklerck R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Nov; 129(11):1473-81. PubMed ID: 19198861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
    Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Novel methods to study functional loading micromechanics at the stem-cement and cement-bone interface in cemented femoral hip replacements.
    Race A; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(4):788-91. PubMed ID: 19906377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of modular neck variation on bone and cement mantle mechanics around a total hip arthroplasty stem.
    Simpson DJ; Little JP; Gray H; Murray DW; Gill HS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Mar; 24(3):274-85. PubMed ID: 19263573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.