These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18198774)

  • 41. In-vitro characteristics of cemented titanium femoral stems with a smooth surface finish.
    Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Kaneuji A; Matsumoto T; Nakamura T
    J Orthop Sci; 2013 Jan; 18(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22945910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Limited V-shaped cement augmentation of the proximal femur to prevent secondary hip fractures.
    Fliri L; Sermon A; Wähnert D; Schmoelz W; Blauth M; Windolf M
    J Biomater Appl; 2013 Jul; 28(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 22492197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Acoustic monitoring (RFM) of total hip arthroplasty - Results of a cadaver study.
    Unger AC; Cabrera-Palacios H; Schulz AP; Jürgens Ch; Paech A
    Eur J Med Res; 2009 Jun; 14(6):264-71. PubMed ID: 19541587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reducing the risk of bone cement implantation syndrome during femoral arthroplasty.
    Rothberg DL; Kubiak EN; Peters CL; Randall RL; Aoki SK
    Orthopedics; 2013 Apr; 36(4):e463-7. PubMed ID: 23590786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Femoroplasty-augmentation of mechanical properties in the osteoporotic proximal femur: a biomechanical investigation of PMMA reinforcement in cadaver bones.
    Heini PF; Franz T; Fankhauser C; Gasser B; Ganz R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Jun; 19(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 15182986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influence of the twin peg design on femoral Interface temperature and maximum load to failure in cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Reiner T; Schwarze M; Panzram B; Klotz MC; Bitsch RG; Jaeger S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Jun; 55():23-27. PubMed ID: 29649670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of pre-cooling and pre-heating procedures on cement polymerization and thermal osteonecrosis in cemented hip replacements.
    Li C; Schmid S; Mason J
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Sep; 25(7):559-64. PubMed ID: 12835068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of long-term physiological activity on the long-term stem stability of cemented hip arthroplasty: in vitro comparison of three commercial bone cements.
    Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Cristofolini L; Erani P; Viceconti M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 20225457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Implant stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: allograft bone packing following extended proximal femoral osteotomy.
    Chassin EP; Silverton CD; Berzins A; Rosenberg AG
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Dec; 12(8):863-8. PubMed ID: 9458251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Micromechanics of postmortem-retrieved cement-bone interfaces.
    Miller MA; Eberhardt AW; Cleary RJ; Verdonschot N; Mann KA
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Feb; 28(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 19658167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cancellous and cortical morselized allograft in revision total hip replacement: A biomechanical study of implant stability.
    Kligman M; Rotem A; Roffman M
    J Biomech; 2003 Jun; 36(6):797-802. PubMed ID: 12742447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of the stem fixation scenario on load transfer in a hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a biomimetic stem.
    Caouette C; Bureau MN; Vendittoli PA; Lavigne M; Nuño N
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 May; 45():90-100. PubMed ID: 25688031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reinforcement of bone cement around the femoral prosthesis tip by pre-coated wire coil: a human cadaver bone study.
    Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 8922261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Properties of composite specimens of old and new bone cement.
    Acharya A; Timperley AJ; Lee AJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jan; 225(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 21381491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The skeletal response to matt and polished cemented femoral stems.
    Barker DS; Wang AW; Yeo MF; Nawana NS; Brumby SA; Pearcy MJ; Howie DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Nov; 82(8):1182-8. PubMed ID: 11132284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Plate fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures: What happens to the cement mantle?
    Konstantinidis L; Schmidt B; Bernstein A; Hirschmüller A; Schröter S; Südkamp NP; Helwig P
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Feb; 231(2):138-142. PubMed ID: 28013577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sensitivity analysis of a cemented hip stem to implant position and cement mantle thickness.
    Shi J; Browne M; Strickland M; Flivik G; Taylor M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014 Nov; 17(15):1671-84. PubMed ID: 23405986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of vacuum mixing and pre-heating the femoral component on the mechanical properties of the cement mantle.
    Baleani M; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Engels GE; Viceconti M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 20190321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Plain radiographs inadequate for evaluation of the cement-bone interface in the hip prosthesis. A cadaver study of femoral stems.
    Jacobs ME; Koeweiden EM; Slooff TJ; Huiskes R; van Horn JR
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1989 Oct; 60(5):541-3. PubMed ID: 2603653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cement-implant interface gaps explain the poor results of CMW3 for femoral stem fixation: A cadaver study of migration, fatigue and mantle morphology.
    Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Oct; 76(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 16263615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.