These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18199052)

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis of suture anchors and suture materials in the canine femur.
    Giles JT; Coker D; Rochat MC; Payton ME; Subramarian V; Bartels KE
    Vet Surg; 2008 Jan; 37(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 18199052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of a veterinary suture anchor in the canine cadaver pelvis and femur.
    Singer MJ; Pijanowski G; Wiley R; Johnson AL; Siegel AM
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2005; 18(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16594214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of a suture anchor and a toggle rod for use in toggle pin fixation of coxofemoral luxations.
    Spranklin D; Elder S; Boyle C; McLaughlin R
    J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2006; 42(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 16527912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical properties of isolated loops of nylon leader material, polyethylene cord, and polyethylene tape and mechanical properties of those materials secured to cadaveric canine femurs via lateral femoral fabellae, toggles placed through bone tunnels, or bone anchors.
    Choate CJ; Pozzi A; Lewis DD; Hudson CC; Conrad BP
    Am J Vet Res; 2012 Oct; 73(10):1519-29. PubMed ID: 23013177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of suture anchor eyelet position on suture failure load.
    Aktay SA; Kowaleski MP
    Vet Surg; 2011 Jun; 40(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 21539579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of suture pullout from canine arytenoid cartilages: effects of hole diameter, suture configuration, suture size, and distraction rate.
    Mathews KG; Roe S; Stebbins M; Barnes R; Mente PL
    Vet Surg; 2004; 33(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 15104624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suture anchor materials, eyelets, and designs: update 2008.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Beavis RC; Barrera Oro F
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Aug; 24(8):859-67. PubMed ID: 18657733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of 3 suture anchor configurations for repair of type II SLAP lesions.
    Domb BG; Ehteshami JR; Shindle MK; Gulotta L; Zoghi-Moghadam M; MacGillivray JD; Altchek DW
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Feb; 23(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 17276220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of four prosthetic ligament repair techniques for tarsal medial collateral ligament injury in dogs.
    Martin Y; Johnson MD; Travers CJ; Colee J; McConkey MJ; Banks SA
    Am J Vet Res; 2019 May; 80(5):469-479. PubMed ID: 31034275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical advantages of triple-loaded suture anchors compared with double-row rotator cuff repairs.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Schroeder FA; Aziz-Jacobo J; Mays MM; Rapley JH
    Arthroscopy; 2010 Mar; 26(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 20206040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Triple-loaded single-anchor stitch configurations: an analysis of cyclically loaded suture-tendon interface security.
    Coons DA; Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1154-8. PubMed ID: 17084289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cyclic load testing and ultimate failure strength of biodegradable glenoid anchors.
    Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Feb; 24(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 18237708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of a 4.75-mm and a 5.5-mm bone anchor at two insertion angles using one and two strands of suture.
    Salyer SA; Suber JT; Melara LM; Kieves NR
    Am J Vet Res; 2022 May; 83(7):. PubMed ID: 35930779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cyclic load testing of biodegradable suture anchors containing 2 high-strength sutures.
    Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Apr; 23(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 17418326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A biomechanical comparison of two suture anchor configurations for the repair of type II SLAP lesions subjected to a peel-back mechanism of failure.
    Morgan RJ; Kuremsky MA; Peindl RD; Fleischli JE
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 18375268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sutures and suture anchors--update 2006.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Coons DA; Boothby MH
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Oct; 22(10):1063.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17027403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rotator cuff repair: an ex vivo analysis of suture anchor repair techniques on initial load to failure.
    Cummins CA; Appleyard RC; Strickland S; Haen PS; Chen S; Murrell GA
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1236-41. PubMed ID: 16226653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of screws and suture anchors in metaphyseal bone of the canine tibia.
    Robb JL; Cook JL; Carson W
    Vet Surg; 2005; 34(5):499-508. PubMed ID: 16266343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of glycomer 631 and glycomer 631 knotless for use in canine incisional gastropexy.
    Arbaugh M; Case JB; Monnet E
    Vet Surg; 2013 Feb; 42(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 23094713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suture strength and angle of load application in a suture anchor eyelet.
    Deakin M; Stubbs D; Bruce W; Goldberg J; Gillies RM; Walsh WR
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1447-51. PubMed ID: 16376233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.