These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1819939)

  • 1. [Comparison of location between nasion and orbital points on soft tissue and on bony structures, in articulatory technique].
    Seifert D; Vukovojac S; Muretić Z; Pandurić J
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1991; 25(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 1819939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The angle between the Frankfort horizontal and the sella-nasion line. Changes in porion and orbitale position during growth.
    Greiner P; Müller B; Dibbets J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 May; 65(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15160248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The location of the infraorbital foramen in human skulls, to be used as new anthropometric landmarks as a useful method for maxillofacial surgery.
    Przygocka A; Podgórski M; Jędrzejewski K; Topol M; Polguj M
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2012 Aug; 71(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 22936558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of a fixed value nasion relator in facebow design.
    Wilcox CW; Sheets JL; Wilwerding TM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 17971110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associations between the postural orientation of sella-nasion and skeletodental morphology.
    Showfety KJ; Vig PS; Matteson S; Phillips C
    Angle Orthod; 1987 Apr; 57(2):99-112. PubMed ID: 3473953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A study on the reference planes and lines for dental practice].
    Kato T
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Mar; 28(1 Pt 1):1-19. PubMed ID: 2135101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The potential role of stereolithography in the study of facial aging.
    Pessa JE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Feb; 119(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11174556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Certain anatomical relations and the precise morphometry of the infraorbital foramen--canal and groove: an anatomical and cephalometric study.
    Kazkayasi M; Ergin A; Ersoy M; Bengi O; Tekdemir I; Elhan A
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):609-14. PubMed ID: 11359128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A protocol for cranial base reference in cephalometric studies.
    Alves PV; Mazucheli J; Vogel CJ; Bolognese AM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):211-5. PubMed ID: 18216691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bony interorbital distance (BIOD), head size, and level of the cribriform plate relative to orbital height: I. Normal standards for age and sex.
    Costaras M; Pruzansky S; Broadbent BH
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1982; 2(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 7130357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Midsagittal facial tissue thicknesses of children and adolescents from the Montreal growth study.
    Smith SL; Buschang PH
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Nov; 46(6):1294-302. PubMed ID: 11714138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-based analysis of 227 white males and females to establish range of malar-maxillary cephalometric relationships.
    Leonard MS; Walker GF
    J Oral Surg; 1977 Dec; 35(12):974-6. PubMed ID: 270563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinicoanatomic study on the craniofacial bones used for cranio- and maxillofacial implants.
    Matsuura M; Ohno K; Michi K; Egawa K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 11858568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The concept of the sagittal orbital-globe relationship in craniofacial surgery.
    Mulliken JB; Godwin SL; Pracharktam N; Altobelli DE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Apr; 97(4):700-6. PubMed ID: 8628763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Superficial surgical landmarks for the frontal sinus.
    Tubbs RS; Elton S; Salter G; Blount JP; Grabb PA; Oakes WJ
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Feb; 96(2):320-2. PubMed ID: 11838806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional analysis system for orthognathic surgery patients with jaw deformities.
    Terajima M; Yanagita N; Ozeki K; Hoshino Y; Mori N; Goto TK; Tokumori K; Aoki Y; Nakasima A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 18617109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting nose projection and pronasale position in facial approximation: a test of published methods and proposal of new guidelines.
    Stephan CN; Henneberg M; Sampson W
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2003 Nov; 122(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 14533182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of the reconstruction of occlusal plane by use of Ponans angle].
    Seifert D; Pandurić J; Muretić Z; Vukovojac S; Meniga A
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1991; 25(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 1819944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomic guidelines for the placement of external references for maxillary repositioning.
    Scarbrough FE; Ghali GE; Smith BR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Nov; 84(5):465-8. PubMed ID: 9394374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft tissue facial planes and masticatory muscle function in skeletal Class III patients before and after orthognathic surgery treatment.
    Sforza C; Peretta R; Grandi G; Ferronato G; Ferrario VF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 66(4):691-8. PubMed ID: 18355592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.