These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18199896)

  • 1. Performance characteristics for some typical QT study designs under the ICH E-14 guidance.
    Hutmacher MM; Chapel S; Agin MA; Fleishaker JC; Lalonde RL
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 48(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 18199896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical issues including design and sample size calculation in thorough QT/QTc studies.
    Zhang J; Machado SG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):451-67. PubMed ID: 18470755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of baseline measurement on the change from baseline in QTc intervals.
    Tian H; Natarajan J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):542-52. PubMed ID: 18470762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical assessment of QT/QTc prolongation based on maximum of correlated normal random variables.
    Cheng B; Chow SC; Burt D; Cosmatos D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):494-501. PubMed ID: 18470758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on E14 Clinical Evaluation of QT/QTc Interval Prolongation and Proarrhythmic Potential for Non-Antiarrhythmic Drugs; availability. Notice.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2005 Oct; 70(202):61134-5. PubMed ID: 16237860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of QT/QTc prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for nonantiarrhythmic drugs: the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use E14 guideline.
    Darpo B; Nebout T; Sager PT
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2006 May; 46(5):498-507. PubMed ID: 16638733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of baseline ECG collection on the planning, analysis and interpretation of 'thorough' QT trials.
    Sethuraman V; Sun Q
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 18481273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing proarrhythmic potential of drugs when optimal studies are infeasible.
    Rock EP; Finkle J; Fingert HJ; Booth BP; Garnett CE; Grant S; Justice RL; Kovacs RJ; Kowey PR; Rodriguez I; Sanhai WR; Strnadova C; Targum SL; Tsong Y; Uhl K; Stockbridge N
    Am Heart J; 2009 May; 157(5):827-36, 836.e1. PubMed ID: 19376308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A statistical assessment of QT data following placebo and moxifloxacin dosing in thorough QT studies.
    Stylianou A; Roger J; Stephens K
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):502-16. PubMed ID: 18470759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical issues of QT prolongation assessment based on linear concentration modeling.
    Tsong Y; Shen M; Zhong J; Zhang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):564-84. PubMed ID: 18470764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation testing in thorough QT/QTc clinical trials.
    Tsong Y; Zhong J; Chen WJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):529-41. PubMed ID: 18470761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is a thorough QTc study necessary? The role of modeling and simulation in evaluating the QTc prolongation potential of drugs.
    Rohatagi S; Carrothers TJ; Kuwabara-Wagg J; Khariton T
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2009 Nov; 49(11):1284-96. PubMed ID: 19734373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple comparisons of repeated measured response: issues of assessment of prolongation of QT interval in thorough QT trials.
    Tsong Y; Zhong J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 20358439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing for positive control activity in a thorough QTc study.
    Zhang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):517-28. PubMed ID: 18470760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical analysis methods for QT/QTc prolongation.
    Ma H; Smith B; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):553-63. PubMed ID: 18470763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size calculations in thorough QT studies.
    Zhang L; Dmitrienko A; Luta G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(3):468-82. PubMed ID: 18470756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of several methods for analyzing data from thorough QT studies.
    Tian H; Qiao W; Natarajan J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):632-40. PubMed ID: 20358441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concentration-QT relationships play a key role in the evaluation of proarrhythmic risk during regulatory review.
    Garnett CE; Beasley N; Bhattaram VA; Jadhav PR; Madabushi R; Stockbridge N; Tornøe CW; Wang Y; Zhu H; Gobburu JV
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Jan; 48(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 18094216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of ANOVA to estimate inter- and intra-reader variability for a group of readers in thorough QT/QTc studies.
    Natekar M; Mahajan V; Satra A; O'Kelly M; Karnad DR
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Mar; 83(3):489-91. PubMed ID: 18183035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ICH E14 Q & A (R1) document: perspectives on the updated recommendations on thorough QT studies.
    Shah RR; Morganroth J
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Apr; 75(4):959-65. PubMed ID: 22905923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.