BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18199916)

  • 1. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a way to simplify IMRT.
    Ludlum E; Xia P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):807-21. PubMed ID: 18199916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
    Jones S; Williams M
    Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A difference-matrix metaheuristic for intensity map segmentation in step-and-shoot IMRT delivery.
    Gunawardena AD; D'Souza WD; Goadrich LD; Meyer RR; Sorensen KJ; Naqvi SA; Shi L
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2517-36. PubMed ID: 16675867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver IMRT plans in the treatment of prostate cancer.
    Kim Y; Verhey LJ; Xia P
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2147-56. PubMed ID: 17404460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a strategy for improving therapeutic gain and reducing the integral dose.
    Abate A; Pressello MC; Benassi M; Strigari L
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(23):7183-98. PubMed ID: 19920309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and tomotherapy treatment plans for skull-base tumors.
    Soisson ET; Tomé WA; Richards GM; Mehta MP
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16490269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
    Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved stratification algorithms for step-and-shoot MLC delivery in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Süss P; Küfer KH; Thieke C
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):6039-51. PubMed ID: 17881818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of conformal and intensity modulated treatment planning techniques for early prostate cancer.
    Vaarkamp J; Malde R; Dixit S; Hamilton CS
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Jun; 53(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 19624299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving dose homogeneity in large breasts by IMRT: efficacy and dosimetric accuracy of different techniques.
    Abo-Madyan Y; Polednik M; Rahn A; Schneider F; Dobler B; Wenz F; Lohr F
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Feb; 184(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18259700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of forward planning with automated inverse planning for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer without IMRT.
    Mendes R; Lavrenkov K; Bedford JL; Henrys A; Ashley S; Brada M
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 16564591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On-line re-optimization of prostate IMRT plans for adaptive radiation therapy.
    Wu QJ; Thongphiew D; Wang Z; Mathayomchan B; Chankong V; Yoo S; Lee WR; Yin FF
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):673-91. PubMed ID: 18199909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Monte Carlo-based procedure for independent monitor unit calculation in IMRT treatment plans.
    Pisaturo O; Moeckli R; Mirimanoff RO; Bochud FO
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4299-310. PubMed ID: 19531844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and linac-IMRT treatment plans for head and neck cancer patients.
    Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Moros EG; Corry PM; Yan Y; Ratanatharathorn V
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 19944587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A particle swarm optimization algorithm for beam angle selection in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
    Li Y; Yao D; Yao J; Chen W
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3491-514. PubMed ID: 16030379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
    Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the role of modeling parameters in IMRT plan optimization.
    Krause M; Scherrer A; Thieke C
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4907-26. PubMed ID: 18711248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An examination of the number of required apertures for step-and-shoot IMRT.
    Jiang Z; Earl MA; Zhang GW; Yu CX; Shepard DM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5653-63. PubMed ID: 16306659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct aperture optimization of breast IMRT and the dosimetric impact of respiration motion.
    Zhang G; Jiang Z; Shepard D; Zhang B; Yu C
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):N357-69. PubMed ID: 17019024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of an optimization concept for arc-modulated cone beam therapy.
    Ulrich S; Nill S; Oelfke U
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4099-119. PubMed ID: 17664597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.