148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18200788)
1. Assessment of palatal bone thickness in adults with cone beam computerised tomography.
Gracco A; Luca L; Cozzani M; Siciliani G
Aust Orthod J; 2007 Nov; 23(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 18200788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of palatal bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew placement.
Gracco A; Lombardo L; Cozzani M; Siciliani G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 18774082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative evaluation with CBCT of palatal bone thickness in growing patients.
Gracco A; Lombardo L; Cozzani M; Siciliani G
Prog Orthod; 2006; 7(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 17143344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluation of palatal bone thickness in adults with normal occlusion for orthodontic miniscrews placement].
Zhao H; Gu XM; Liu HC; Wang ZW; Xun CL
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 21575442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone Beam Computed Tomography evaluation of palatal bone thickness for miniscrew placement in Down's syndrome.
Diniz-Freitas M; Seoane-Romero J; Fernández-Varela M; Abeleira MT; Diz P; Cadarso-Suárez C; Guler I; Limeres J
Arch Oral Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(9):1333-9. PubMed ID: 26126288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tomographic mapping of the hard palate and overlying mucosa.
Marquezan M; Nojima LI; Freitas AO; Baratieri C; Alves Júnior M; Nojima Mda C; Araújo MT
Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22344336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Palatal bone thickness and associated factors in adult miniscrew placements: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Poon YC; Chang HP; Tseng YC; Chou ST; Cheng JH; Liu PH; Pan CY
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 May; 31(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 25910562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three dimensional anatomical exploration of the anterior hard palate at the level of the third ruga for the placement of mini-implants--a cone-beam CT study.
Hourfar J; Kanavakis G; Bister D; Schätzle M; Awad L; Nienkemper M; Goldbecher C; Ludwig B
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 25564503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults.
Kang S; Lee SJ; Ahn SJ; Heo MS; Kim TW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4 Suppl):S74-81. PubMed ID: 17448390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative evaluation of palatal bone thickness for the placement of orthodontic miniscrews in adults with different facial types.
Wang Y; Qiu Y; Liu H; He J; Fan X
Saudi Med J; 2017 Oct; 38(10):1051-1057. PubMed ID: 28917071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness for Insertion of Orthodontic Mini-Implants in Adults and Adolescents.
Wang M; Sun Y; Yu Y; Ding X
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 28(6):1468-1471. PubMed ID: 28841595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of palatal bone height for insertion of orthodontic implants - a retrospective CBCT study.
Chhatwani S; Rose-Zierau V; Haddad B; Almuzian M; Kirschneck C; Danesh G
Head Face Med; 2019 Apr; 15(1):9. PubMed ID: 30935392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The evaluation of palatal bone thickness for implant insertion with cone beam computed tomography.
Sumer AP; Caliskan A; Uzun C; Karoz TB; Sumer M; Cankaya S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 45(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 26458537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement.
Ryu JH; Park JH; Vu Thi Thu T; Bayome M; Kim Y; Kook YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 22858330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphological evaluation of the nasopalatine canal using cone beam computed tomography and its clinical implications for orthodontic miniscrew insertion.
Gibas-Stanek M; Kościółek-Rudy D; Szumilas K; Wojas-Hille K; Pihut M
Dent Med Probl; 2024; 61(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 38808382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative assessment of palatal bone thickness in an ethnic Indian population: a computed tomography study.
Jayakumar G; ; Biju T; George MA; Krishnaswamy NR
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 22842249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomic site evaluation of the palatal bone for temporary orthodontic anchorage devices.
Wehrbein H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jul; 19(7):653-6. PubMed ID: 18492079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual scoring and mapping of hard and soft tissues of the anterior hard palate for orthodontic miniscrew insertion.
Poorsattar-Bejeh Mir A; Haghanifar S; Poorsattar-Bejeh Mir M; Rahmati-Kamel M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26446347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How palatal vault morphology and screw length influence the accuracy of dynamic computer-guided orthodontic miniscrew insertion. A prospective clinical study.
Brilli D; Cauli I; Cassetta M
J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105093. PubMed ID: 38788916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do the miniscrews of the prefabricated systems for the "appliance first" protocol of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion have lengths that meet the palatal thickness of patients?
Alves ACM; de Carvalho NO; Cunha ÂCPP; Rabelo SGF; Pereira HSG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jun; 163(6):e152-e161. PubMed ID: 37125981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
