These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18200789)

  • 21. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A long-term follow-up study of Class II malocclusion correction after treatment with Class II elastics or fixed functional appliances.
    Nelson B; Hägg U; Hansen K; Bendeus M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 17920503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of AdvanSync and intermaxillary elastics in the correction of Class II malocclusions: A retrospective clinical study.
    Jayachandran S; Wiltshire WA; Hayasaki SM; Pinheiro FH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Dec; 150(6):979-988. PubMed ID: 27894547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Class II treatment effects of the Fränkel appliance.
    Janson GR; Toruño JL; Martins DR; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 25(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 12831221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes in growing class II malocclusion patients during nonextraction orthodontic treatment.
    Combrink FJ; Harris AM; Steyn CL; Hudson AP
    SADJ; 2006 Sep; 61(8):344-50. PubMed ID: 17165248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Change in lip vermilion height during orthodontic treatment.
    Perkins RA; Staley RN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Feb; 103(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 8427219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A cephalometric study of class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance.
    Covell DA; Trammell DW; Boero RP; West R
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 10456598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of adenoidectomy and changed mode of breathing on incisor and molar dentoalveolar heights and anterior face heights.
    Mahony D; Karsten A; Linder-Aronson S
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 16429879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes.
    Sharma AA; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 15821692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Management of severe Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report.
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Sundari KK
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 22372276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition.
    de Almeida MR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Weber U; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):540-7. PubMed ID: 16097222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A cephalometric study of the Class II correction effects of the Eureka Spring.
    Stromeyer EL; Caruso JM; DeVincenzo JP
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Jun; 72(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 12071603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Investigation of the vertical variations in the anterior region of Class II, division 1 malocclusions treated with different techniques].
    Hamamci O
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 2489155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A cephalometric appraisal of nonextraction Begg treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Meistrell ME; Cangialosi TJ; Lopez JE; Cabral-Angeles A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Oct; 90(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 3464190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [A comparison of skeletal changes between adult and adolescent with skeletal class II malocclusions before and after therapy].
    Zhao JH; Ding Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 42(5):578-81. PubMed ID: 20957019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Class II malocclusion treatment using Jasper Jumper appliance associated to intermaxillary elastics: a case report.
    Herrera-Sanches FS; Henriques JF; Janson G; Neves LS; de Lima KJ; Henriques RP; Pieri LV
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):22-9. PubMed ID: 23916428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.