These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Physiology of aging and its influence on the contact lens prescription. Benjamin WJ; Borish IM J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Oct; 62(10):743-53. PubMed ID: 1813499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient response to concentric bifocal contact lenses. Harris MG; Sheedy JE; Bronge MR; Joe SM; Mook MA J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 1813535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An objective and subjective comparative analysis of diffractive and front surface aspheric contact lens designs used to correct presbyopia. Brenner MB CLAO J; 1994 Jan; 20(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8149568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quality of vision with presbyopic contact lens correction: subjective and light sensitivity rating. Alongi S; Rolando M; Corallo G; Siniscalchi C; Monaco M; SaccĂ S; Verrastro G; Menoni S; Ravera GB; Calabria G Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Sep; 239(9):656-63. PubMed ID: 11688664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sighting dominance and monovision distance binocular fusional ranges. McGill EC; Erickson P J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Oct; 62(10):738-42. PubMed ID: 1813498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Monovision vs. aspheric bifocal contact lenses: a crossover study. Josephson JE; Caffery BE J Am Optom Assoc; 1987 Aug; 58(8):652-4. PubMed ID: 3624759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Visual acuity in contact lens wearers. Bailey MD; Walline JJ; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Oct; 78(10):726-31. PubMed ID: 11700966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical experience with the Tangent Streak RGP bifocal contact lens. Josephson JE; Wong M; Caffery BE J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Mar; 60(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 2708764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A quantitative and qualitative assessment of the NOVAWET-Perception bifocal contact lens. Anderson CW; Bierly JR; Litteral G; Gross J; Hainsworth D CLAO J; 1996 Apr; 22(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 8728616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does the presbyopic visual system adapt to contact lenses? Sheedy JE; Harris MG; Gan CM Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):482-6. PubMed ID: 8336910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Characteristic of binocular vision found for presbyopic patients wearing single vision contact lenses. Lebow KA; Goldberg JB J Am Optom Assoc; 1975 Nov; 46(11):1116-23. PubMed ID: 802938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A clinical evaluation of two multifocal soft contact lenses. Gussler CH; Solomon KD; Gussler JR; Litteral G; Van Meter WS CLAO J; 1992 Oct; 18(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 1424058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Visual function with presbyopic contact lens correction. Erickson P; Schor C Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 67(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 2407989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Interest of presbyopes in contact lens correction and their success with monovision. Gauthier CA; Holden BA; Grant T; Chong MS Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Nov; 69(11):858-62. PubMed ID: 1454302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]