These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18201335)

  • 1. A comparison of two methods for estimating polymegethism in cell areas of the human corneal endothelium.
    Doughty MJ; Oblak E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 18201335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Could the coefficient of variation (COV) of the corneal endothelium be overestimated when a centre-dot method is used?
    Doughty MJ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Jan; 91(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 18045256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphometry of corneal endothelium in patients with corneal guttata.
    Giasson CJ; Solomon LD; Polse KA
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1469-75. PubMed ID: 17507098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corneal thickness and endothelial cell characteristics in patients with myotonic dystrophy.
    Rosa N; Lanza M; Borrelli M; Filosa ML; De Bernardo M; Ventriglia VM; Cecio MR; Politano L
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):223-5. PubMed ID: 19969362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of corneal endothelial image analysis by Konan SP8000 noncontact and Bio-Optics Bambi systems.
    Benetz BA; Diaconu E; Bowlin SJ; Oak SS; Laing RA; Lass JH
    Cornea; 1999 Jan; 18(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 9894940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Further analysis of assessments of the coefficient of variation of corneal endothelial cell areas from specular microscopic images.
    Doughty MJ; Aakre BM
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Sep; 91(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 18537989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying relationships between tomography-derived corneal thickness, curvature, and diameter and in vivo confocal microscopic assessment of the endothelium in healthy corneas of young adults.
    Patel HY; Patel DV; McGhee CN
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):270-8. PubMed ID: 18259207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corneal endothelium evaluation with 2 noncontact specular microscopes and their semiautomated methods of analysis.
    de Sanctis U; Machetta F; Razzano L; Dalmasso P; Grignolo FM
    Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 16783136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The methods of analysis of the endothelial microscopy].
    Loukotová V; Hlinomazová Z; Horácková M; Vlková E
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2007 May; 63(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 17621834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of possible error sources in corneal endothelial morphometry with a semiautomated noncontact specular microscope.
    Doughty MJ
    Cornea; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1196-203. PubMed ID: 23792438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of a video-based noncontact specular microscope for assessing the corneal endothelium.
    Prinz A; Varga J; Findl O
    Cornea; 2007 Sep; 26(8):924-9. PubMed ID: 17721289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopy of human cornea by white light scanning slit and laser scanning systems.
    Szaflik JP
    Cornea; 2007 May; 26(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 17457193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting corneal endothelial morphology.
    Sheng H; Bullimore MA
    Cornea; 2007 Jun; 26(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 17525643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a ten-year period.
    Bourne WM; Nelson LR; Hodge DO
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Mar; 38(3):779-82. PubMed ID: 9071233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the regional variability of averaged cell area estimates for the human corneal endothelium in relation to the extent of polymegethism.
    Doughty MJ
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 38(6):2537-2546. PubMed ID: 29119310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corneal endothelial morphologic features in cataract and clear lens in an Indian population.
    Praveen MR; Vasavada AR; Ghodadra B; Edelhauser HF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 144(6):914-920. PubMed ID: 17919447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance in specular reflection and slit-imaging corneal topography.
    Braaf B; Dubbelman M; van der Heijde RG; Sicam VA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 May; 86(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 19342978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Central versus paracentral endothelial cell density values in relation to duration of soft contact lens wear.
    Doughty MJ; Aakre BM
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Jul; 33(4):180-4. PubMed ID: 17630625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An observational cross-sectional study on the corneal endothelium of medium-term rigid gas permeable contact lens wearers.
    Doughty MJ
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Apr; 40(2):109-115. PubMed ID: 27986387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Prospective study on the repercussions of oculomotor surgery on children's corneal endothelium].
    Denis D; Toesca E
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2010 May; 33(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 20434793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.