These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18201339)

  • 1. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements.
    Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
    Altoaimi BH; Kollbaum P; Meyer D; Bradley A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.
    Salmon TO; van de Pol C
    Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):461-72. PubMed ID: 16150413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
    Martinez AA; Pandian A; Sankaridurg P; Rose K; Huynh SC; Mitchell P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peripheral refraction in myopic patients after orthokeratology.
    Queirós A; González-Méijome JM; Jorge J; Villa-Collar C; Gutiérrez AR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 May; 87(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 20375751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability and Validity of Peripheral Refraction with Two Different Autorefractors.
    Morrison AM; Mutti DO
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Jun; 97(6):429-439. PubMed ID: 32511165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peripheral refraction in high myopia with spherical soft contact lenses.
    Kwok E; Patel B; Backhouse S; Phillips JR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 89(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 22282223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of refractive error: comparison of autorefractor and focometer.
    du Toit R; Soong K; Brian G; Ramke J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):582-8. PubMed ID: 16909083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of accommodation and refractive status on the peripheral refractive profile.
    Davies LN; Mallen EA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 93(9):1186-90. PubMed ID: 19525242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of fogging lenses and cycloplegia on open-field automatic refraction.
    Queirós A; González-Méijome J; Jorge J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 18565095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the relative peripheral refraction effect of single vision and multifocal contact lenses measured using an autorefractor and an aberrometer: A pilot study.
    Bakaraju RC; Fedtke C; Ehrmann K; Ho A
    J Optom; 2015; 8(3):206-18. PubMed ID: 25662364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measured with three different models of autorefractors.
    Gwiazda J; Weber C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jan; 81(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 14747762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peripheral refraction for distance and near vision in emmetropes and myopes.
    Calver R; Radhakrishnan H; Osuobeni E; O'Leary D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):584-93. PubMed ID: 17956364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical note: effect of contact lenses on measurement of the accommodation microfluctuations.
    Day M; Strang NC; Seidel D; Gray LS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 18201340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peripheral refraction in myopia corrected with spectacles versus contact lenses.
    Backhouse S; Fox S; Ibrahim B; Phillips JR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Jul; 32(4):294-303. PubMed ID: 22577970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
    Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Central and peripheral autorefraction repeatability in normal eyes.
    Moore KE; Berntsen DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Sep; 91(9):1106-12. PubMed ID: 25062133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripheral refractive changes associated with myopia progression.
    Radhakrishnan H; Allen PM; Calver RI; Theagarayan B; Price H; Rae S; Sailoganathan A; O'Leary DJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1573-81. PubMed ID: 23385793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer.
    Win-Hall DM; Ostrin LA; Kasthurirangan S; Glasser A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 17873774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.