BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1820277)

  • 21. [Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of environmental chemicals].
    Ito N; Imaida K; Ogiso T; Tamano S; Kurata Y
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1986 Dec; 13(12):3345-53. PubMed ID: 3789750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Key characteristics of 86 agents known to cause cancer in humans.
    Krewski D; Bird M; Al-Zoughool M; Birkett N; Billard M; Milton B; Rice JM; Grosse Y; Cogliano VJ; Hill MA; Baan RA; Little J; Zielinski JM
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2019; 22(7-8):244-263. PubMed ID: 31637961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The IARC program on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to man.
    Tomatis L
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1976; 271():396-409. PubMed ID: 1069530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB): results of animal bioassays published in the general literature in 1993 to 1994 and by the National Toxicology Program in 1995 to 1996.
    Gold LS; Manley NB; Slone TH; Rohrbach L
    Environ Health Perspect; 1999 Aug; 107 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):527-600. PubMed ID: 10421768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Structure-activity relations: maximizing the usefulness of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity databases.
    Klopman G; Rosenkranz H
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():67-75. PubMed ID: 1820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Animal carcinogenicity studies: 1. Poor human predictivity.
    Knight A; Bailey J; Balcombe J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Feb; 34(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 16522147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identification of carcinogens within the IARC monograph program.
    Vainio H; Wilbourn J
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1992; 18 Suppl 1():64-73. PubMed ID: 1411382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The relation between carcinogenesis and mutagenesis: a re-evaluation].
    Bartsch H; Malaveille C
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1989 Nov; 173(8):1005-12; discussion 1013-5. PubMed ID: 2633853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term chemical carcinogenesis experiments for identifying potential human cancer hazards: collective database of the National Cancer Institute and National Toxicology Program (1976-1991).
    Huff J; Haseman J
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():23-31. PubMed ID: 1820269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examples of uses of databases for quantitative and qualitative correlation studies between genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.
    Parodi S; Malacarne D; Taningher M
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():61-6. PubMed ID: 1820280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The genetic toxicity database of the National Toxicology Program: evaluation of the relationships between genetic toxicity and carcinogenicity.
    Tennant RW
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():47-51. PubMed ID: 1820276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of carcinogenicity bioassays in the IARC monographs.
    Cogliano VJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Sep; 1076():592-600. PubMed ID: 17119235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Chemicals classified by IARC: their potency in tests for carcinogenicity in rodents and their genotoxicity and acute toxicity.
    McGregor DB
    IARC Sci Publ; 1992; (116):323-52. PubMed ID: 1428089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening assays for carcinogenic agents and mixtures: an appraisal based on data in the IARC Monograph series.
    Bartsch H; Malaveille C
    IARC Sci Publ; 1990; (104):65-74. PubMed ID: 2228144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Criteria, rules and procedures adopted by IARC in evaluating risks from different carcinogenic agents for humans].
    IARC
    Vopr Onkol; 2007; 53(6):621-41. PubMed ID: 18416130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of a database on key characteristics of human carcinogens.
    Al-Zoughool M; Bird M; Rice J; Baan RA; Billard M; Birkett N; Krewski D; Zielinski JM
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2019; 22(7-8):264-287. PubMed ID: 31379270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.