These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1820312)

  • 1. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants.
    Johansson CB; Sennerby L; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 1820312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone.
    Sennerby L; Thomsen P; Ericson LE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 1398826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
    Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone.
    Johansson CB; Han CH; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 9638001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone.
    Sul YT; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants.
    Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histomorphometric studies of hydroxylapatite-coated and uncoated CP titanium threaded implants in bone.
    Gottlander M; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 1820308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants coated with fibroblast growth factor-fibronectin (FGF-FN) fusion protein.
    Park JM; Koak JY; Jang JH; Han CH; Kim SK; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):859-66. PubMed ID: 17190295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages.
    Choi JW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lim YJ; Kim SH; Lee JB
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 17168931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of commercially pure niobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone.
    Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 1807419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide.
    Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Andersson B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 8820121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of steroid-induced osteoporosis on osseointegration of titanium implants.
    Fujimoto T; Niimi A; Sawai T; Ueda M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 9581403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.
    Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
    Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluations of bone tissue integration to pure and alloyed titanium implants.
    Stenport VF; Johansson CB
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Sep; 10(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 18241219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages: a rabbit study.
    Park KH; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lee JB; Kim SH; Lim YJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 34(7):517-27. PubMed ID: 17559620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone response to unloaded titanium implants in the fibula, iliac crest, and scapula: an animal study in the Yorkshire pig.
    Rohner D; Meng CS; Hutmacher DW; Tsai KT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 32(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 14505621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Buser D; Nydegger T; Hirt HP; Cochran DL; Nolte LP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 9796144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone.
    Wennerberg A; Ektessabi A; Albrektsson T; Johansson C; Andersson B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 9274077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.