These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1820314)

  • 21. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
    Conrad HJ; Pesun IJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion.
    Assunção WG; Cardoso A; Gomes EA; Tabata LF; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):641-7. PubMed ID: 19090889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
    Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Abdel-Azim T; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 25615919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of the repositioning impression coping technique at the implant level for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Mar; 11(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12705035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of implant impressions without impression copings: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Kwon JH; Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 21640237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions.
    Humphries RM; Yaman P; Bloem TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 2094651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants.
    Cabral LM; Guedes CG
    Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 17563509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Technique for achieving a passive framework fit: a clinical case report.
    Swallow ST
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 15119457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of three-dimensional distortion of two impression materials in the transfer of dental implants.
    Aguilar ML; Elias A; Vizcarrondo CE; Psoter WJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):202-9. PubMed ID: 20362763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of water temperature on the accuracy of stone casts recovered from addition-reaction elastomeric impression materials.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 2083027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Photogrammetry--an alternative to conventional impressions in implant dentistry? A clinical pilot study.
    Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 10635208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of master cast techniques for multiple abutment implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P; Millstein PL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(4):439-46. PubMed ID: 8270314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.