These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1820316)
1. SEM evaluation of the in-vitro effects of an air-abrasive system on various implant surfaces. Barnes CM; Fleming LS; Mueninghoff LA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 1820316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effects of an air-abrasive system on dental implants: a comparative in vitro study between machined and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. Chairay JP; Boulekbache H; Jean A; Soyer A; Bouchard P J Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 68(12):1215-22. PubMed ID: 9444598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of an air-powder abrasive system on plasma-sprayed titanium implant surfaces: an in vitro evaluation. Parham PL; Cobb CM; French AA; Love JW; Drisko CL; Killoy WJ J Oral Implantol; 1989; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 2640245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of peri-implantitis]. Espedito Di Lauro A; Morgese F; Squillace A; Ramaglia L Minerva Stomatol; 2003; 52(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12686908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments. Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of different finishing and polishing agents on the surface roughness of cast pure titanium. Reddy ES; Patil NP; Guttal SS; Jagadish HG J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 17451480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces. Augthun M; Tinschert J; Huber A J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):857-64. PubMed ID: 9736367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants. Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contaminated implant surfaces: an in vitro comparison of implant surface coating and treatment modalities for decontamination. Dennison DK; Huerzeler MB; Quinones C; Caffesse RG J Periodontol; 1994 Oct; 65(10):942-8. PubMed ID: 7823276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of air polishing with glycine powder on titanium abutment surfaces. Cochis A; Fini M; Carrassi A; Migliario M; Visai L; Rimondini L Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):904-9. PubMed ID: 22626061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of various hygiene procedures on the surface characteristics of titanium abutments. Meschenmoser A; d'Hoedt B; Meyle J; Elssner G; Korn D; Hämmerle H; Schulte W J Periodontol; 1996 Mar; 67(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 8708954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments. Rapley JW; Swan RH; Hallmon WW; Mills MP Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2202669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Micro-morphometric assessment of titanium plasma-sprayed coating removal using burs for the treatment of peri-implant disease. Rimondini L; Cicognani Simoncini F; Carrassi A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11168203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface roughness and fatigue performance of commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy after different polishing protocols. Guilherme AS; Henriques GE; Zavanelli RA; Mesquita MF J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 15798689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The surface status of polished restoration biomaterials after the use of a sodium bicarbonate spray: scanning electron microscopy]. Kuliralo M; Dourov N Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 1990; 33(3-4):131-6. PubMed ID: 1966330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Collagen fiber orientation around machined titanium and zirconia dental implant necks: an animal study. Tetè S; Mastrangelo F; Bianchi A; Zizzari V; Scarano A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19344025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant surface alterations from a nonmetallic ultrasonic tip. Bailey GM; Gardner JS; Day MH; Kovanda BJ J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1998; 46(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 10597152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The clinical assessment of a ceramic-coated transmucosal dental implant collar. Barclay CW; Last KS; Williams R Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 9108748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model. Abron A; Hopfensperger M; Thompson J; Cooper LF J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 11174677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early dental plaque formation on toothbrushed titanium implant surfaces. Amarante ES; Chambrone L; Lotufo RF; Lima LA Am J Dent; 2008 Oct; 21(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 19024258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]