These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1820316)

  • 21. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
    Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A
    Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neural response to sandblasted/acid-etched, TiO-blasted, polished, and mechanochemically polished/nanostructured titanium implant surfaces.
    Onur MA; Sezgin A; Gürpinar A; Sommer A; Akça K; Cehreli M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):541-7. PubMed ID: 16958694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surface studies on titanium IMZ implants.
    Kuliralo M; Pireaux JJ; Caudano R; Dourov EN
    J Biol Buccale; 1991 Sep; 19(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 1939048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surface and elemental alterations of dental alloys induced by electro discharge machining (EDM).
    Zinelis S
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):601-7. PubMed ID: 16846638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study.
    Fox SC; Moriarty JD; Kusy RP
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surface analysis of four dental implant systems.
    Olefjord I; Hansson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 8468084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of titanium implant abutment surface irregularities on plaque accumulation in vivo.
    McCollum J; O'Neal RB; Brennan WA; Van Dyke TE; Horner JA
    J Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 63(10):802-5. PubMed ID: 1403586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading: a preliminary study in baboons.
    Watzak G; Zechner W; Ulm C; Tangl S; Tepper G; Watzek G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 16117764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surface properties of endosseous dental implants after NdYAG and CO2 laser treatment at various energies.
    Park CY; Kim SG; Kim MD; Eom TG; Yoon JH; Ahn SG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 63(10):1522-7. PubMed ID: 16182922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cleaning and polishing efficacy of abrasive-bristle brushes and a prophylaxis paste on resin composite material in vitro.
    Schmidlin PR; Sener B; Lutz F
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Oct; 33(9):691-9. PubMed ID: 12666895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
    Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spontaneous progression of ligature induced peri-implantitis at implants with different surface roughness: an experimental study in dogs.
    Berglundh T; Gotfredsen K; Zitzmann NU; Lang NP; Lindhe J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):655-61. PubMed ID: 17608738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparative study of the effects of metallic, nonmetallic, and sonic instrumentation on titanium abutment surfaces.
    Hallmon WW; Waldrop TC; Meffert RM; Wade BW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 8820128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surface characterization of titanium-based implant materials.
    Placko HE; Mishra S; Weimer JJ; Lucas LC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):355-63. PubMed ID: 10874800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
    Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types.
    Kohles SS; Clark MB; Brown CA; Kenealy JN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 15346747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
    Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.