These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1820316)

  • 41. Effect of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating on the osteoconductivity of commercially pure titanium implants.
    Strnad Z; Strnad J; Povýsil C; Urban K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 10960980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
    Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Titanium deposition after peri-implant care with the carbon dioxide laser.
    Deppe H; Greim H; Brill T; Wagenpfeil S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):707-14. PubMed ID: 12381072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics.
    Ahmad R; Morgano SM; Wu BM; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 16275301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of surface treatment on bond strength of low-fusing porcelain to commercially pure titanium.
    Al Hussaini I; Al Wazzan KA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 16198172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service.
    Watson GK; Payne AG; Purton DG; Thomson WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 12066489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
    Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Changes in the surface microrelief and the loss of dental enamel after the use of an abrasive spray of sodium bicarbonate].
    Kuliralo M; Dourov N
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 1990 Jul; 33(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 1964618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Morphological and chemical characteristics of different titanium surfaces treated by bicarbonate and glycine powder air abrasive systems.
    Menini M; Piccardo P; Baldi D; Dellepiane E; Pera P
    Implant Dent; 2015 Feb; 24(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 25621549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cleaning and modification of intraorally contaminated titanium discs with calcium phosphate powder abrasive treatment.
    Tastepe CS; Liu Y; Visscher CM; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1238-46. PubMed ID: 22882522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cleaning potential of different air abrasive powders and their impact on implant surface roughness.
    Matsubara VH; Leong BW; Leong MJL; Lawrence Z; Becker T; Quaranta A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31837107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The qualitative effects of various types of hygiene instrumentation on commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implant abutments: an in vitro and scanning electron microscope study.
    Brookshire FV; Nagy WW; Dhuru VB; Ziebert GJ; Chada S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 9297646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Polishing sequence for titanium using dental armamentarium: a pilot study.
    Russell MM; May KB; Razzoog ME
    Implant Dent; 1993 SUM; 2(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 8242014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of the Effect of Air Polishing With Different Abrasive Powders on the Roughness of Implant Abutment Surface: An In Vitro Study.
    Biazussi BR; Perrotti V; D'Arcangelo C; Elias CN; Bianchini MA; Tumedei M; de Vasconcellos DK
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Jun; 45(3):202-206. PubMed ID: 30875272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of polishing methods on Candida albicans adhesion on cast pure titanium surfaces.
    Li Y; Guo T; Zhao J; Wang J
    Implant Dent; 2013 Oct; 22(5):546-51. PubMed ID: 24013395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of surface roughness on early in vivo plaque colonization on titanium.
    Rimondini L; Farè S; Brambilla E; Felloni A; Consonni C; Brossa F; Carrassi A
    J Periodontol; 1997 Jun; 68(6):556-62. PubMed ID: 9203099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of different methods to clean titanium abutments. A scanning electron microscopic study.
    Speelman JA; Collaert B; Klinge B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Sep; 3(3):120-7. PubMed ID: 1290792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.