These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18203499)

  • 1. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites.
    Ikeda M; Matin K; Nikaido T; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Dent Mater J; 2007 Nov; 26(6):915-23. PubMed ID: 18203499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation.
    Ono M; Nikaido T; Ikeda M; Imai S; Hanada N; Tagami J; Matin K
    Dent Mater J; 2007 Sep; 26(5):613-22. PubMed ID: 18203458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of surface roughness of composite resin on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans in the presence of saliva.
    Park JW; Song CW; Jung JH; Ahn SJ; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 22339385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of surface properties of resin-based composites on in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm development.
    Ionescu A; Wutscher E; Brambilla E; Schneider-Feyrer S; Giessibl FJ; Hahnel S
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Oct; 120(5):458-65. PubMed ID: 22985005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface.
    Nedeljkovic I; De Munck J; Ungureanu AA; Slomka V; Bartic C; Vananroye A; Clasen C; Teughels W; Van Meerbeek B; Van Landuyt KL
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():36-43. PubMed ID: 28554609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbial changes in biofilms on composite resins with different surface roughness: An in vitro study with a multispecies biofilm model.
    Park JW; An JS; Lim WH; Lim BS; Ahn SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):493.e1-493.e8. PubMed ID: 31648793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures.
    Cazzaniga G; Ottobelli M; Ionescu AC; Paolone G; Gherlone E; Ferracane JL; Brambilla E
    J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():43-52. PubMed ID: 28750776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biofilm formation affects surface properties of novel bioactive glass-containing composites.
    Hyun HK; Salehi S; Ferracane JL
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1599-608. PubMed ID: 26590029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
    Pereira CA; Eskelson E; Cavalli V; Liporoni PC; Jorge AO; do Rego MA
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bacterial adhesion on direct and indirect dental restorative composite resins: An in vitro study on a natural biofilm.
    Derchi G; Vano M; Barone A; Covani U; Diaspro A; Salerno M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):669-676. PubMed ID: 27881324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of different polishing techniques for composite resin materials on surface properties and bacterial biofilm formation.
    Kurt A; Cilingir A; Bilmenoglu C; Topcuoglu N; Kulekci G
    J Dent; 2019 Nov; 90():103199. PubMed ID: 31557551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationships between composite roughness and Streptococcus mutans biofilm depth under shear in vitro.
    O'Brien EP; Mondal K; Chen CC; Hanley L; Drummond JL; Rockne KJ
    J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104535. PubMed ID: 37156358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
    Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Ren Y
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites.
    Beyth N; Bahir R; Matalon S; Domb AJ; Weiss EI
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):732-6. PubMed ID: 17897707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites.
    Kantorski KZ; Scotti R; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface response of fluorine polymer-incorporated resin composites to cariogenic biofilm adherence.
    Gyo M; Nikaido T; Okada K; Yamauchi J; Tagami J; Matin K
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 74(5):1428-35. PubMed ID: 18192415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.