These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18204376)

  • 1. Quality of care by a hypertension expert: a cautionary tale for pay-for-performance approaches.
    Watts B; Lawrence R; Litaker D; Aron DC; Neuhauser D
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2008; 17(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 18204376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework.
    Mabotuwana T; Warren J; Elley CR; Kennelly J; Paton C; Warren D; Chang Wai K; Wells S
    Qual Prim Care; 2010; 18(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 20529470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Data quality bias: an underrecognized source of misclassification in pay-for-performance reporting?
    Terris DD; Litaker DG
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2008; 17(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 18204374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using knowledge of multiple levels of variation in care to target performance incentives to providers.
    Turenne MN; Hirth RA; Pan Q; Wolfe RA; Messana JM; Wheeler JR
    Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 18219239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical issues in the design and implementation of pay-for-quality programs.
    Young GJ; Conrad DA
    J Healthc Manag; 2007; 52(1):10-8; discussion 18-9. PubMed ID: 17288114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pay-for-performance in orthopedics: implications for clinical practice.
    Bozic KJ; Smith AR; Mauerhan DR
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Sep; 22(6 Suppl 2):8-12. PubMed ID: 17823006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pay for performance alone cannot drive quality.
    Mandel KE; Kotagal UR
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2007 Jul; 161(7):650-5. PubMed ID: 17606827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
    Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pay for performance in the intensive care unit--opportunity or threat?
    Khanduja K; Scales DC; Adhikari NK
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Mar; 37(3):852-8. PubMed ID: 19237887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A pay-for-performance program in Taiwan improved care for some diabetes patients, but doctors may have excluded sicker ones.
    Chang RE; Lin SP; Aron DC
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Jan; 31(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 22232099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality improvement in New Zealand healthcare. Part 5: measurement for monitoring and controlling performance--the quest for external accountability.
    Perkins R; Seddon M;
    N Z Med J; 2006 Sep; 119(1241):U2149. PubMed ID: 16964301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pay-for-performance as a method to establish the business case for quality.
    Wheeler JR; White B; Rauscher S; Nahra TA; Reiter KL; Curtin KM; Damberg CL
    J Health Care Finance; 2007; 33(4):17-30. PubMed ID: 19172960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Industry influence in the creation of pay-for-performance quality measures.
    Rose J
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2008; 17(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 18204375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pay for performance: rationale and potential implications for urology.
    Gonzalez CM; Penson D; Kosiak B; Dupree J; Clemens JQ
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):402-8. PubMed ID: 17561159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the reliability of physician performance assessment: identifying the "physician effect" on quality and creating composite measures.
    Kaplan SH; Griffith JL; Price LL; Pawlson LG; Greenfield S
    Med Care; 2009 Apr; 47(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 19279511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lessons from evaluations of purchaser pay-for-performance programs: a review of the evidence.
    Christianson JB; Leatherman S; Sutherland K
    Med Care Res Rev; 2008 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):5S-35S. PubMed ID: 19015377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stats snapshot ... encouraging physicians to adopt information technology to participate in pay-for-performance programs.
    Health Data Manag; 2007 Jun; 15(6):66. PubMed ID: 17853539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trying to get IT to pay off in P4P programs.
    Schuerenberg BK
    Health Data Manag; 2007 Oct; 15(10):40, 42, 44 passim. PubMed ID: 17941307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Performance indicators unsuitable to monitor and improve complex health care].
    Giard RW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Apr; 151(17):957-9. PubMed ID: 17520847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readers' perspective. The benefits cf pay-for-performance programs are worth the cost and hassles to provider organizations to participate.
    Linares A; Gauthier P; Isaacs C; Barnett P; Gamache E; Kerchief KR
    Health Data Manag; 2007 Dec; 15(12):10. PubMed ID: 18203598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.