These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18205206)

  • 1. Relationship uncertainty linkage statistics (RULS): affected relative pair statistics that model relationship uncertainty.
    Ray A; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 May; 32(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 18205206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficient intermediate fine mapping: confidence set inference with likelihood ratio test statistic.
    Sinha R; Luo Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):922-36. PubMed ID: 17615574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical testing of genetic linkage under heterogeneity.
    Shoukri MM; Lathrop GM
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):151-61. PubMed ID: 8513100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods.
    Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 11180446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical genomewide significance levels established by whole genome simulations.
    Sawcer S; Jones HB; Judge D; Visser F; Compston A; Goodfellow PN; Clayton D
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 9181352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases.
    Göring HH; Ott J
    Eur J Hum Genet; 1997; 5(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 9195155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjusting for founder relatedness in a linkage analysis using prior information.
    Sheehan NA; Egeland T
    Hum Hered; 2008; 65(4):221-31. PubMed ID: 18073492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: results of incorporating a linkage disequilibrium parameter.
    Goldgar DE; Fain PR
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 14971367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditional likelihood score functions for mixed models in linkage analysis.
    Hössjer O
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):313-32. PubMed ID: 15772109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonparametric linkage analysis. II. Variance components.
    Marlow AJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2002; 195():61-100. PubMed ID: 12070889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hierarchical model for estimating significance levels of non-parametric linkage statistics for large pedigrees.
    Brock GN; Weeks DE; Sobel E; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 31(5):417-30. PubMed ID: 17508354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of parental relationships in maximum lod score affected sib-pair method.
    Leutenegger AL; Génin E; Thompson EA; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Nov; 23(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 12432507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prior segregation analysis and the power to detect linkage.
    Atwood LD; Slifer SH
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):755-60. PubMed ID: 9433573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linkage analysis of complex disorders with multiple phenotypic categories: simulation studies and application to bipolar disorder data.
    Levinson DF
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):653-8. PubMed ID: 9433558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multivariate and multilocus variance components method, based on structural relationships to assess quantitative trait linkage via SEGPATH.
    Province MA; Rice TK; Borecki IB; Gu C; Kraja A; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 12548674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lod scores for gene mapping in the presence of marker map uncertainty.
    Stringham HM; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 21(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11443732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficiency robust statistics for genetic linkage and association studies under genetic model uncertainty.
    Joo J; Kwak M; Chen Z; Zheng G
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):158-80. PubMed ID: 19918942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longitudinal data analysis in pedigree studies.
    Gauderman WJ; Macgregor S; Briollais L; Scurrah K; Tobin M; Park T; Wang D; Rao S; John S; Bull S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003; 25 Suppl 1():S18-28. PubMed ID: 14635165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Linkage analysis for complex diseases: a new life for an old method].
    Rebaï A
    Arch Inst Pasteur Tunis; 2000; 77(1-4):25-35. PubMed ID: 14658225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.