These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1820536)

  • 1. [Impressions].
    Laverman JV
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1991 Oct; 98(10):403-7. PubMed ID: 1820536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression].
    Biffar R; Bittner B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disinfection of impressions. Methods and effects on accuracy.
    Poulos JG; Antonoff LR
    N Y State Dent J; 1997; 63(6):34-6. PubMed ID: 9256603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of the type and technique used for impression making on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Habib AN; Shehata MT
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Oct; 41(4):1409-16. PubMed ID: 9497690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impression in pH-adjusted sodium hypochlorite. Part 1: Microbiology.
    Schwartz RS; Hensley DH; Bradley DV
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 8957855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fabrication of a custom-made impression tray for making preliminary impressions of edentulous mandibles.
    Sofou AM; Diakoyianni-Mordohai I; Pissiotis AL; Emmanuel I
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):513-6. PubMed ID: 9807132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A predictable and accurate technique with elastomeric impression materials.
    Barghi N; Ontiveros JC
    Am J Dent; 1999 Aug; 12(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 10649919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impression tray--an important factor in impression precision.
    Rehberg HJ
    Int Dent J; 1977 Jun; 27(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 328405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A historical review of hydrocolloids and an investigation of the dimensional accuracy of the new alginates for crown and bridge impressions when using stock trays.
    Hansson O; Eklund J
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(2):81-95. PubMed ID: 6377548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations.
    Lane DA; Randall RC; Lane NS; Wilson NH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 12616233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Issues in handling impression materials.
    Giordano R
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12004656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.