These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18205655)

  • 1. Dental unit water: bacterial decontamination of old and new dental units by flushing water.
    Watanabe E; Agostinho AM; Matsumoto W; Ito I
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2008 Feb; 6(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 18205655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failure of anti-retraction valves and the procedure for between patient flushing: a rationale for chemical control of dental unit waterline contamination.
    Montebugnoli L; Dolci G; Spratt DA; Puttaiah R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 16296436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental unit waterline contamination and its possible implications during periodontal surgery.
    Putnins EE; Di Giovanni D; Bhullar AS
    J Periodontol; 2001 Mar; 72(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 11327068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro modeling of dental water line contamination and decontamination.
    Spratt DA; Latif J; Montebugnoli LL; Wilson M
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2004 Jun; 235(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 15183886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legionella pneumophila contamination of a dental unit water line system in a dental teaching centre.
    Ma'ayeh SY; Al-Hiyasat AS; Hindiyeh MY; Khader YS
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2008 Feb; 6(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 18205654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: distilled water vs. antimicrobial agents.
    Kettering JD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Stephens JA; Naylor WP; Zhang W
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 30(10):735-41. PubMed ID: 12403476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: tap water versus distilled water.
    Kettering JD; Stephens JA; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Aug; 3(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 12239573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of in-line bacteriological filters on numbers of heterotrophic bacteria in water emitted from non-autoclavable dental air-water syringes.
    Mayo JA; Brown CE
    Am J Dent; 1999 Oct; 12(5):256-60. PubMed ID: 10649918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the dental unit waterline systems of teaching clinics.
    Al-Hiyasat AS; Ma'ayeh SY; Hindiyeh MY; Khader YS
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2007 Feb; 5(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 17250577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of cleaning regimes on dental water unit contamination.
    Abdallah SA; Khalil AI
    J Water Health; 2011 Dec; 9(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 22048424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Formation and decontamination of biofilms in dental unit waterlines.
    Wirthlin MR; Marshall GW; Rowland RW
    J Periodontol; 2003 Nov; 74(11):1595-609. PubMed ID: 14682656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines: comparison between Er:YAG laser and turbine lines.
    Sacchetti R; Baldissarri A; De Luca G; Lucca P; Stampi S; Zanetti F
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 17196001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a protocol for reducing the microbial contamination of dental unit water.
    Monteiro RM; Marques DM; Domingues PCA; Oliveira VC; Macedo AP; Razaboni AM; Watanabe E
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2018 Dec; 31(3):138-143. PubMed ID: 30829368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental unit waterlines: review and product evaluation.
    Panagakos FS; Lassiter T; Kumar E
    J N J Dent Assoc; 2001; 72(2):20-5, 38. PubMed ID: 11484611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of distillation and line cleaning on the quality of water emitted from dental units.
    Palenik CJ; Miller CH
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):385-9. PubMed ID: 15002952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A between-patient disinfection method to control water line contamination and biofilm inside dental units.
    Montebugnoli L; Chersoni S; Prati C; Dolci G
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Apr; 56(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 15066741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of frequent clinical use of dental unit waterlines on contamination.
    Porteous NB; Partida MN
    N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):20-4. PubMed ID: 19548488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Water-quality of Westbrabantse dental units and the effect of flushing].
    Teixeira RM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2002 Aug; 109(8):307-11. PubMed ID: 12212457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bacterial contamination of the water supply in newly installed dental units.
    Williams HN; Johnson A; Kelley JI; Baer ML; King TS; Mitchell B; Hasler JF
    Quintessence Int; 1995 May; 26(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 7568755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How does time-dependent dental unit waterline flushing affect planktonic bacteria levels?
    Cobb CM; Martel CR; McKnight SA; Pasley-Mowry C; Ferguson BL; Williams K
    J Dent Educ; 2002 Apr; 66(4):549-55. PubMed ID: 12017153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.