These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18205736)

  • 1. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 4: Failure analysis of 10 fractured retaining screws retrieved from three patients.
    Al Jabbari YS; Fournelle R; Ziebert G; Toth J; Iacopino AM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 18205736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 1: Characterization of adhesive wear and structure of retaining screws.
    Al Jabbari YS; Fournelle R; Ziebert G; Toth J; Iacopino AM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 18005336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 3: Preload and tensile fracture load testing.
    Al Jabbari YS; Fournelle R; Ziebert G; Toth J; Iacopino AM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 18205737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 2: Metallurgical and microhardness analysis.
    Al Jabbari Y; Fournelle R; Ziebert G; Toth J; Iacopino A
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):181-91. PubMed ID: 18047489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws.
    Sakaguchi RL; Borgersen SE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 7615325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination.
    Cheung GS; Peng B; Bian Z; Shen Y; Darvell BW
    Int Endod J; 2005 Nov; 38(11):802-9. PubMed ID: 16218972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses.
    al-Turki LE; Chai J; Lautenschlager EP; Hutten MC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 11887597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of screw retention of nine abutment systems: a pilot study.
    Schulte JK; Coffey J
    Implant Dent; 1997; 6(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 9206402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of loading conditions on fatigue-failed implants by fracture surface analysis.
    Huang HM; Tsai CM; Chang CC; Lin CT; Lee SY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(6):854-9. PubMed ID: 16392341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Failure modes with point loading of three commercially available denture teeth.
    Moffitt AR; Woody RD; Parel SM; Miller BH
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):432-8. PubMed ID: 18482363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
    Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preload loss in gold prosthesis-retaining screws as a function of time.
    Cantwell A; Hobkirk JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 14982365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw- versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis.
    Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Traini T; Di lorio D; Caputi S
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 16564081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fatigue failure of as-received and retrieved NiTi orthodontic archwires.
    Bourauel C; Scharold W; Jäger A; Eliades T
    Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1095-101. PubMed ID: 18289660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fractures of the fixture component of an osseointegrated implant.
    Morgan MJ; James DF; Pilliar RM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 8270309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
    Kinsel RP; Lin D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation of the constituent elements and modes of fracture of in vivo fractured metallic posts.
    Fox K; Wood DJ; Youngson CC
    J Dent; 2007 Jan; 35(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16757082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modes of failure of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use.
    Wei X; Ling J; Jiang J; Huang X; Liu L
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 17320713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parametric analysis of the strength in the ''Toronto'' osseous-prosthesis system.
    Cicciù M; Risitano G; Maiorana C; Franceschini G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009; 58(1-2):9-23. PubMed ID: 19234433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.