These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18206624)

  • 1. Selection of a rating scale in receiver operating characteristic studies: some remaining issues.
    Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):245-8. PubMed ID: 18206624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binary and multi-category ratings in a laboratory observer performance study: a comparison.
    Gur D; Bandos AI; King JL; Klym AH; Cohen CS; Hakim CM; Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Perrin RL; Poller WR; Shah R; Sumkin JH; Wallace LP; Rockette HE
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4404-9. PubMed ID: 18975686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of continuous and discrete confidence judgments in receiver operating characteristic studies of diagnostic imaging techniques.
    Rockette HE; Gur D; Metz CE
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Feb; 27(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 1601610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical comparison of ROC curves from multiple readers.
    Swaving M; van Houwelingen H; Ottes FP; Steerneman T
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 8778532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?
    Gur D; Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Zuley ML; Hakim CM; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Sumkin JH
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 20236840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quasi-continuous and discrete confidence rating scales for observer performance studies: Effects on ROC analysis.
    Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 17178364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multireader receiver operating characteristic studies: a comparison of study designs.
    Obuchowski NA
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):709-16. PubMed ID: 9419629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the generalization of the receiver operating characteristic analysis to the population of readers and cases with the jackknife method: an assessment.
    Rockette HE; Gur D; Kurs-Lasky M; King JL
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Jan; 2(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 9419527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reader variance in ROC studies--generalizability to reader population at high and low performance levels.
    Gur D; Bandos AI; Klym AH; Rockette HE
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Aug; 13(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16843853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis: some quantitative considerations.
    Wagner RF; Beiden SV; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Apr; 8(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 11293781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A probabilistic model for the MRMC method, part 1: theoretical development.
    Clarkson E; Kupinski MA; Barrett HH
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1410-21. PubMed ID: 17070460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empiric assessment of parameters that affect the design of multireader receiver operating characteristic studies.
    Rockette HE; Campbell WL; Britton CA; Holbert JM; King JL; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Dec; 6(12):723-9. PubMed ID: 10887893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An empirical comparison of discrete ratings and subjective probability ratings.
    Berbaum KS; Dorfman DD; Franken EA; Caldwell RT
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jul; 9(7):756-63. PubMed ID: 12139089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Lenth RV; Chen YF; Donaghy BA
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5(9):591-602. PubMed ID: 9750888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical power in observer-performance studies: comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and free-response methods in tasks involving localization.
    Chakraborty D
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Feb; 9(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 11918367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applicability of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis on discrete caries depth ratings.
    Verdonschot EH; Wenzel A; Bronkhorst EM
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1993 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 8222599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.
    Obuchowski NA
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The diagnostic accuracy/efficacy of MRI in differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from metastatic colorectal/breast carcinoma: a multiple reader ROC analysis using a jackknife technique.
    Lee MG; Baker ME; Sostman HD; Spritzer CE; Paine S; Paulson EK; Keogan MT
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(6):905-13. PubMed ID: 8933789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [BVC (bias to variance characteristic) analysis].
    Matsumoto T
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 Dec; 34(13):1539-47. PubMed ID: 2622045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.