146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18208608)
1. Comparative endurance testing of the Biomet Matthews Nail and the dynamic compression screw, in simulated condylar and supracondylar femoral fractures.
O'Connor-Read LM; Davidson JA; Davies BM; Matthews MG; Smirthwaite P
Biomed Eng Online; 2008 Jan; 7():3. PubMed ID: 18208608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of locked distal screws in retrograde nailing of osteoporotic distal femur fractures: a laboratory study using cadaver femurs.
Tejwani NC; Park S; Iesaka K; Kummer F
J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Jul; 19(6):380-3. PubMed ID: 16003196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The mechanics of internal fixation of fractures of the distal femur: a comparison of the condylar screw (DCS) with the condylar plate (CP).
Harder Y; Martinet O; Barraud GE; Cordey J; Regazzoni P
Injury; 1999; 30 Suppl 1():A31-9. PubMed ID: 10645367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rotationally Stable Screw-Anchor With Locked Trochanteric Stabilizing Plate Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in the Treatment of AO/OTA 31A2.2 Fracture: A Biomechanical Evaluation.
Knobe M; Nagel P; Maier KJ; Gradl G; Buecking B; Sönmez TT; Modabber A; Prescher A; Pape HC
J Orthop Trauma; 2016 Jan; 30(1):e12-8. PubMed ID: 26849388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bridge plate osteosynthesis using dynamic condylar screw (DCS) or retrograde intramedullary supracondylar nail (RIMSN) in the treatment of distal femoral fractures: comparison of two methods in a prospective randomized study.
Dar GN; Tak SR; Kangoo KA; Halwai MA
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2009 Mar; 15(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 19353317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The early failure of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw in femurs with a wide medullary canal. A biomechanical study of intertrochanteric fractures.
Ceynowa M; Zerdzicki K; Klosowski P; Pankowski R; Rocławski M; Mazurek T
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():201-207. PubMed ID: 31775090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical study of the safe distance between distal femoral fracture site and distal locking screws in antegrade intramedullary nailing.
Antekeier SB; Burden RL; Voor MJ; Roberts CS
J Orthop Trauma; 2005; 19(10):693-7. PubMed ID: 16314716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative biomechanical analysis of supracondylar femur fracture fixation: locked intramedullary nail versus 95-degree angled plate.
David SM; Harrow ME; Peindl RD; Frick SL; Kellam JF
J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Jul; 11(5):344-50. PubMed ID: 9294798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis of a subtrochanteric fractured femur with dynamic hip screw, dynamic condylar screw, and proximal femur nail implants--a comparative study.
Sowmianarayanan S; Chandrasekaran A; Kumar RK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Jan; 222(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 18335723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increasing nail-cortical contact to increase fixation stability and decrease implant strain in antegrade locked nailing of distal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study.
Huang SC; Lin CC; Lin J
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):436-42. PubMed ID: 19065112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internal fixation of supracondylar femoral fractures: comparative biomechanical performance of the 95-degree blade plate and two retrograde nails.
Ito K; Grass R; Zwipp H
J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 9619461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Osteosynthesis for periprosthetic supracondylar fracture above a total knee arthroplasty using a locking compression plate].
Krbec M; Motycka J; Lunácek L; Dousa P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Dec; 76(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 20067694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Internal fixation of proximal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison of the Gamma Locking Nail and the Omega Compression Hip Screw.
Shaw JA; Wilson S
Orthop Rev; 1993 Jan; 22(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8421636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of screw combination and nail materials in the stability of anterograde reamed intramedullary nail in distal femoral fractures.
Gabarre S; Albareda J; Gracia L; Puértolas S; Ibarz E; Herrera A
Injury; 2017 Nov; 48 Suppl 6():S47-S53. PubMed ID: 29162241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 3 Methods for Maintaining Inter-Fragmentary Compression After Fracture Reduction and Fixation.
Au B; Groundland J; Stoops TK; Santoni BG; Sagi HC
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Apr; 31(4):210-213. PubMed ID: 27984452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal location of a single distal interlocking screw in intramedullary nailing of distal third femoral shaft fractures.
George CJ; Lindsey RW; Noble PC; Alexander JW; Kamaric E
J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 9619462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate weight-bearing after treatment of a comminuted fracture of the femoral shaft with a statically locked intramedullary nail.
Brumback RJ; Toal TR; Murphy-Zane MS; Novak VP; Belkoff SM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Nov; 81(11):1538-44. PubMed ID: 10565645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of fracture pattern stability on implant loading in OTA type 31-A2 proximal femur fractures.
Marmor M; Liddle K; Pekmezci M; Buckley J; Matityahu A
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Dec; 27(12):683-9. PubMed ID: 23412511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
