These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18208617)

  • 21. Stakeholder involvement in health research priority setting in low income countries: the case of Zambia.
    Kapiriri L
    Res Involv Engagem; 2018; 4():41. PubMed ID: 30460042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Disease control priorities for neglected tropical diseases: lessons from priority ranking based on the quality of evidence, cost effectiveness, severity of disease, catastrophic health expenditures, and loss of productivity.
    Strømme EM; Baerøe K; Norheim OF
    Dev World Bioeth; 2014 Dec; 14(3):132-41. PubMed ID: 23724925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.
    Nishi FA; de Motta Maia FO; de Lopes Monteiro da Cruz DA
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Nov; 13(11):64-73. PubMed ID: 26657465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Prioritisation in health care: learning from international experiences].
    Marckmann G
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 19476306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Priority setting in health policy in Sweden and a comparison with Norway.
    Calltorp J
    Health Policy; 1999 Dec; 50(1-2):1-22. PubMed ID: 10827297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Priority setting in the provincial health services authority: survey of key decision makers.
    Teng F; Mitton C; Mackenzie J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 7():84. PubMed ID: 17565691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CHAT SA: Modification of a Public Engagement Tool for Priority Setting for a South African Rural Context.
    Tugendhaft A; Danis M; Christofides N; Kahn K; Erzse A; Gold M; Twine R; Khosa A; Hofman K
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Feb; 11(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 32654436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The unfunded priorities: an evaluation of priority setting for noncommunicable disease control in Uganda.
    Essue BM; Kapiriri L
    Global Health; 2018 Feb; 14(1):22. PubMed ID: 29463270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Beyond cost-effectiveness, morbidity and mortality: a comprehensive evaluation of priority setting for HIV programming in Uganda.
    Kapiriri L; Lee NM; Wallace LJ; Kwesiga B
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):359. PubMed ID: 30935380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The problem of discrimination in health care priority setting.
    Hadorn DC
    JAMA; 1992 Sep; 268(11):1454-9. PubMed ID: 1387422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Norwegian National Council for Priority Setting in Health Care: decisions and justifications.
    Wester G; Bringedal B
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2018 Apr; 13(2):118-136. PubMed ID: 28322184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
    Carter YH; Shaw S; Macfarlane F
    Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 2002 Feb; (81):iii-vi, 1-72. PubMed ID: 12049028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?
    Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):766-73. PubMed ID: 19070414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting.
    Sibbald SL; Singer PA; Upshur R; Martin DK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Mar; 9():43. PubMed ID: 19265518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A new proposal for priority setting in Norway: Open and fair.
    Ottersen T; Førde R; Kakad M; Kjellevold A; Melberg HO; Moen A; Ringard Å; Norheim OF
    Health Policy; 2016 Mar; 120(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 26851991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Setting priorities in health care organizations: criteria, processes, and parameters of success.
    Gibson JL; Martin DK; Singer PA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Sep; 4(1):25. PubMed ID: 15355544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Priority setting and resource allocation in the US health system: is there a place for hard caps?
    Mitton C; Dionne F
    J Health Organ Manag; 2020 Feb; ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):. PubMed ID: 32096928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.