128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18208798)
21. Comparison of two tests for detecting carcinogenic HPV in women with Papanicolaou smear reports of ASCUS and LSIL.
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Woodward L
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9487319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
Mango LJ; Valente PT
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Follow up of atypical squamous cell Pap smears in Iraqi women.
Pity IS; Shamdeen MY; Wais SA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(7):3455-60. PubMed ID: 22994777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Only a small fraction of high-grade cervical lesions are discovered after an interpretation of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance when using imager-assisted, liquid-based papanicolaou tests and the Bethesda 2001 system.
Khan KA; Smith DA; Thrall MJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 137(7):936-41. PubMed ID: 22994456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improved abnormal Pap smear triage using cervical cancer biomarkers.
Killeen JL; Dye T; Grace C; Hiraoka M
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2014 Jan; 18(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23760145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population.
Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Leung BS; Khoo US; Ng AW
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 14681939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Association of Abnormal Pap Smear with Occult Cervical Stromal Invasion in Patients with Endometrial Cancer.
Khumthong K; Aue-Aungkul A; Kleebkaow P; Chumworathayi B; Temtanakitpaisan A; Nhokaew W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Sep; 20(9):2847-2850. PubMed ID: 31554386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens.
Kumar N; Bongiovanni M; Molliet MJ; Pelte MF; Egger JF; Pache JC
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):351-8. PubMed ID: 18522633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Do health care providers have a lower prevalence of abnormal pap smears than the general public?
Suwannarurk K; Bhamarapravatana K; Kheolamai P; Thaweekul Y; Mairaing K; Poomtavorn Y; Pattaraarchachai J
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S114-9. PubMed ID: 21294405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Low-grade pap smears containing occasional high-grade cells as a predictor of high-grade dysplasia.
Power P; Gregoire J; Duggan M; Nation J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Oct; 28(10):884-887. PubMed ID: 17140504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arbyn M; Bergeron C; Klinkhamer P; Martin-Hirsch P; Siebers AG; Bulten J
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 18165406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy.
Genest DR; Dean B; Lee KR; Sheets E; Crum CP; Cibas ES
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 9648902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Update on ASCCP consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical screening tests and cervical histology.
Apgar BS; Kittendorf AL; Bettcher CM; Wong J; Kaufman AJ
Am Fam Physician; 2009 Jul; 80(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 19621855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
