354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18208849)
1. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial.
Schwitter J; Wacker CM; van Rossum AC; Lombardi M; Al-Saadi N; Ahlstrom H; Dill T; Larsson HB; Flamm SD; Marquardt M; Johansson L
Eur Heart J; 2008 Feb; 29(4):480-9. PubMed ID: 18208849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.
Schwitter J; Wacker CM; Wilke N; Al-Saadi N; Sauer E; Huettle K; Schönberg SO; Luchner A; Strohm O; Ahlstrom H; Dill T; Hoebel N; Simor T;
Eur Heart J; 2013 Mar; 34(10):775-81. PubMed ID: 22390914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: The secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial).
Schwitter J; Wacker CM; Wilke N; Al-Saadi N; Sauer E; Huettle K; Schönberg SO; Debl K; Strohm O; Ahlstrom H; Dill T; Hoebel N; Simor T;
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Sep; 14(1):61. PubMed ID: 22938651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance vs SPECT Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease.
Arai AE; Schulz-Menger J; Shah DJ; Han Y; Bandettini WP; Abraham A; Woodard PK; Selvanayagam JB; Hamilton-Craig C; Tan RS; Carr J; Teo L; Kramer CM; Wintersperger BJ; Harisinghani MG; Flamm SD; Friedrich MG; Klem I; Raman SV; Haverstock D; Liu Z; Brueggenwerth G; Santiuste M; Berman DS; Pennell DJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 82(19):1828-1838. PubMed ID: 37914512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease from the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease (CE-MARC) Trial.
Greenwood JP; Motwani M; Maredia N; Brown JM; Everett CC; Nixon J; Bijsterveld P; Dickinson CJ; Ball SG; Plein S
Circulation; 2014 Mar; 129(10):1129-38. PubMed ID: 24357404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride microbubble (SonoVue)-enhanced myocardial contrast echocardiography with gated single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of significant coronary artery disease: a large European multicenter study.
Senior R; Moreo A; Gaibazzi N; Agati L; Tiemann K; Shivalkar B; von Bardeleben S; Galiuto L; Lardoux H; Trocino G; Carrió I; Le Guludec D; Sambuceti G; Becher H; Colonna P; Ten Cate F; Bramucci E; Cohen A; Bezante G; Aggeli C; Kasprzak JD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(15):1353-61. PubMed ID: 23770168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of Coronary CT Angiography, Stress Dual-Energy CT Perfusion, and Stress Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison with Combined Invasive Coronary Angiography and Stress Perfusion Cardiac MRI.
Chung HW; Ko SM; Hwang HK; So Y; Yi JG; Lee EJ
Korean J Radiol; 2017; 18(3):476-486. PubMed ID: 28458600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Color-encoded semiautomatic analysis of multi-slice first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion: comparison to tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography perfusion and X-ray angiography.
Thiele H; Plein S; Breeuwer M; Ridgway JP; Higgins D; Thorley PJ; Schuler G; Sivananthan MU
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2004 Oct; 20(5):371-84; discussion 385-7. PubMed ID: 15765860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac magnetic resonance performs better in the detection of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis compared to single-photon emission computed tomography and dobutamine stress echocardiography.
Kamiya K; Sakakibara M; Asakawa N; Yamada S; Yoshitani T; Iwano H; Komatsu H; Naya M; Chiba S; Yamada S; Manabe O; Kikuchi Y; Oyama-Manabe N; Oba K; Tsutsui H
Circ J; 2014; 78(10):2468-76. PubMed ID: 25109426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of coronary artery disease with perfusion stress echocardiography using a novel ultrasound imaging agent: two Phase 3 international trials in comparison with radionuclide perfusion imaging.
Senior R; Monaghan M; Main ML; Zamorano JL; Tiemann K; Agati L; Weissman NJ; Klein AL; Marwick TH; Ahmad M; DeMaria AN; Zabalgoitia M; Becher H; Kaul S; Udelson JE; Wackers FJ; Walovitch RC; Picard MH;
Eur J Echocardiogr; 2009 Jan; 10(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 19131498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional significance of stenoses in coronary artery bypass grafts. Evaluation by single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and angiography.
Salm LP; Bax JJ; Vliegen HW; Langerak SE; Dibbets P; Jukema JW; Lamb HJ; Pauwels EK; de Roos A; van der Wall EE
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Nov; 44(9):1877-82. PubMed ID: 15519022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
Jaarsma C; Leiner T; Bekkers SC; Crijns HJ; Wildberger JE; Nagel E; Nelemans PJ; Schalla S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(19):1719-28. PubMed ID: 22554604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location.
Manka R; Paetsch I; Kozerke S; Moccetti M; Hoffmann R; Schroeder J; Reith S; Schnackenburg B; Gaemperli O; Wissmann L; Wyss CA; Kaufmann PA; Corti R; Boesiger P; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Jahnke C
Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(16):2016-24. PubMed ID: 22677136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.
Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive value of a positive stress single-photon emission computed tomography or stress cardiac magnetic resonance for ruling in obstructive coronary artery disease in a real-world setting.
Silva C; Lopes P; Gonçalves M; Ventosa A; Calqueiro J; Freitas P; Guerreiro S; Brito J; Abecasis J; Raposo L; Saraiva C; de Araújo Gonçalves P; Santos A; Campante Teles R; de Sousa Almeida M; Ferreira AM
Rev Port Cardiol; 2023 Sep; 42(9):787-793. PubMed ID: 37257584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Detecting Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Ischemia: Comparison with Coronary Angiography.
Laspas F; Pipikos T; Karatzis E; Georgakopoulos N; Prassopoulos V; Andreou J; Moulopoulos LA; Chatziioannou A; Danias PG
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Mar; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 32235380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging.
Klem I; Heitner JF; Shah DJ; Sketch MH; Behar V; Weinsaft J; Cawley P; Parker M; Elliott M; Judd RM; Kim RJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Apr; 47(8):1630-8. PubMed ID: 16631001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of stress perfusion MRI and SPECT for detection of myocardial ischemia in patients with angiographically proven three-vessel coronary artery disease.
Chung SY; Lee KY; Chun EJ; Lee WW; Park EK; Chang HJ; Choi SI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):356-62. PubMed ID: 20651190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease.
Bettencourt N; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Azevedo L; Teixeira M; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 61(10):1099-107. PubMed ID: 23375929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using freeware package (cardioBull).
Okuda K; Nakajima K; Hosoya T; Ishikawa T; Matsuo S; Kawano M; Taki J; Kinuya S
Ann Nucl Med; 2011 Oct; 25(8):571-9. PubMed ID: 21698436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
