586 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18208873)
1. Predictive role of evoked potential examinations in patients with clinically isolated optic neuritis in light of the revised McDonald criteria.
Simó M; Barsi P; Arányi Z
Mult Scler; 2008 May; 14(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 18208873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association between clinical conversion to multiple sclerosis in radiologically isolated syndrome and magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and visual evoked potential: follow-up of 70 patients.
Lebrun C; Bensa C; Debouverie M; Wiertlevski S; Brassat D; de Seze J; Rumbach L; Pelletier J; Labauge P; Brochet B; Tourbah A; Clavelou P;
Arch Neurol; 2009 Jul; 66(7):841-6. PubMed ID: 19597085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multifocal visual evoked potential analysis of inflammatory or demyelinating optic neuritis.
Fraser CL; Klistorner A; Graham SL; Garrick R; Billson FA; Grigg JR
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):323.e1-323.e2. PubMed ID: 16406544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative study of visual evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis].
Miletto G; Merlihot JM; Nezri M; Stanoyevitch JF; Pernet-Rambaud C; Houis B
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988; 11(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 3385127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do multimodal evoked potentials add information to MRI in clinically isolated syndromes?
Pelayo R; Montalban X; Minoves T; Moncho D; Rio J; Nos C; Tur C; Castillo J; Horga A; Comabella M; Perkal H; Rovira A; Tintoré M
Mult Scler; 2010 Jan; 16(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 19995838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure to develop multiple sclerosis in patients with neurologic symptoms without objective evidence.
Boster A; Caon C; Perumal J; Hreha S; Zabad R; Zak I; Tselis A; Lisak R; Khan O
Mult Scler; 2008 Jul; 14(6):804-8. PubMed ID: 18573830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pediatric optic neuritis: brain MRI abnormalities and risk of multiple sclerosis.
Bonhomme GR; Waldman AT; Balcer LJ; Daniels AB; Tennekoon GI; Forman S; Galetta SL; Liu GT
Neurology; 2009 Mar; 72(10):881-5. PubMed ID: 19273821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Childhood multiple sclerosis (MS): multimodal evoked potentials (EP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) comparative study.
Scaioli V; Rumi V; Cimino C; Angelini L
Neuropediatrics; 1991 Feb; 22(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 2038422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early MRI in optic neuritis: the risk for clinically definite multiple sclerosis.
Swanton JK; Fernando KT; Dalton CM; Miszkiel KA; Altmann DR; Plant GT; Thompson AJ; Miller DH
Mult Scler; 2010 Feb; 16(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 20086028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Paraclinical tests in multiple sclerosis. Clinical correlation and predictive value].
Iriarte J; de Castro P; Artieda J; Zubieta JL; Martínez-Lage JM
Neurologia; 1993 Feb; 8(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8452688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis by evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.
Cutler JR; Aminoff MJ; Brant-Zawadzki M
Ann Neurol; 1986 Nov; 20(5):645-8. PubMed ID: 3789682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A risk of developing multiple sclerosis following an outbreak of optic neuritis during a mean follow-up of 4.5 years].
Deyá E; Sevilla T; Coret F
Neurologia; 1998 Oct; 13(8):377-81. PubMed ID: 9859669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Acute myelopathies in young patients and multiple sclerosis. prospective study of 20 cases].
Dalecky A; Pelletier J; Chérif AA; Lévrier O; Khalil R
Rev Neurol (Paris); 1997 Oct; 153(10):569-78. PubMed ID: 9684021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Course of illness and prognosis of multiple sclerosis. 2: Predictive value of clinical and paraclinical factors].
Flachenecker P; Hartung HP
Nervenarzt; 1996 Jun; 67(6):444-51. PubMed ID: 8767198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].
Staffen W; Trinka E; Ladurner G
Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosing multiple sclerosis?
Djuric S; Djuric V; Zivkovic M; Milosevic V; Jolic M; Stamenovic J; Djordjevic G; Calixto M
Neurol India; 2010; 58(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 20739788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective study of patients presenting with acute partial transverse myelopathy.
Cordonnier C; de Seze J; Breteau G; Ferriby D; Michelin E; Stojkovic T; Pruvo JP; Vermersch P
J Neurol; 2003 Dec; 250(12):1447-52. PubMed ID: 14673577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid findings in optic neuritis.
Jacobs LD; Kaba SE; Miller CM; Priore RL; Brownscheidle CM
Ann Neurol; 1997 Mar; 41(3):392-8. PubMed ID: 9066361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging at first episode in pediatric multiple sclerosis retrospective evaluation according to KIDMUS and lesion dissemination in space criteria.
Kurne A; Oguz KK; Oz Aksu A; Yarar C; Duman O; Kurul SH; Serdaroglu A; Anlar B
Brain Dev; 2010 Jun; 32(6):487-94. PubMed ID: 19682809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Baseline MRI predicts future attacks and disability in clinically isolated syndromes.
Tintoré M; Rovira A; Río J; Nos C; Grivé E; Téllez N; Pelayo R; Comabella M; Sastre-Garriga J; Montalban X
Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(6):968-72. PubMed ID: 17000962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
