300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18209170)
1. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000.
Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS;
Am J Contact Dermat; 2003 Jun; 14(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 14749021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
Soni BP; Sherertz EF
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Albert MR; González S; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9810020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rate of patch test reactions to a Dermatophagoides mix currently on the market: a mite too sensitive?
Davis MD; Richardson DM; Ahmed DD
Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Jun; 13(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 12022123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997.
Albert MR; Chang Y; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Regional variation in prevalence and etiology of allergic contact dermatitis.
Thompson TR; Belsito DV
Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Dec; 13(4):177-82. PubMed ID: 12478532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Patch testing with the "Austrian standard series"--epidemiologic test values and results].
Kränke B; Binder M; Derhaschnig J; Komericki P; Pirkhammer D; Ziegler V; Aberer W
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1995; 107(11):323-30. PubMed ID: 7610657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Occupational chromate allergy in Singapore: a study of 87 patients and a review from 1983 to 1995.
Wong SS; Chan MT; Gan SL; Ng SK; Goh CL
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9471980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Associated positive patch test reactions to standard contact allergens.
Brasch J; Uter W; Geier J; Schnuch A;
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Dec; 12(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 11753892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of contact sensitization in vulvar lichen simplex chronicus. A proposal for a battery of selected allergens.
Virgili A; Bacilieri S; Corazza M
J Reprod Med; 2003 Jan; 48(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12611092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens.
Saripalli YV; Achen F; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Jul; 49(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12833010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patch testing by additional series of allergens: results of further experiences.
Francalanci S; Giorgini S; Ricci L; Sertoli A
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Dec; 12(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 11753893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patch test sensitization to Compositae mix, sesquiterpene-lactone mix, Compositae extracts, laurel leaf, Chlorophorin, Mansonone A, and dimethoxydalbergione.
Kanerva L; Estlander T; Alanko K; Jolanki R
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 11244135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contact sensitivity in pruritus vulvae: patch test results and clinical outcome.
Lewis FM; Shah M; Gawkrodger DJ
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 9249280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Textile dermatitis in patients with contact sensitization in Israel: a 4-year prospective study.
Lazarov A
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2004 Sep; 18(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 15324387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Excited skin syndrome: study of 39 patients.
Duarte I; Lazzarini R; Bedrikow R
Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Jun; 13(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 12022121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multicenter study of patch test reactions with dental screening series.
Kanerva L; Rantanen T; Aalto-Korte K; Estlander T; Hannuksela M; Harvima RJ; Hasan T; Horsmanheimo M; Jolanki R; Kalimo K; Lahti A; Lammintausta K; Lauerma A; Niinimäki A; Turjanmaa K; Vuorela AM
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Jun; 12(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 11381343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
