These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18210769)

  • 1. Orthodontic anchorage--Evidence-based evaluation of anchorage capacity and patients' perceptions.
    Feldmann I
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (191):10-86. PubMed ID: 18210769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anchorage capacity of osseointegrated and conventional anchorage systems: a randomized controlled trial.
    Feldmann I; Bondemark L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e19-28. PubMed ID: 18331927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orthodontic anchoring techniques and its influence on pain, discomfort, and jaw function--a randomized controlled trial.
    Feldmann I; List T; Bondemark L
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 21300723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pain intensity and discomfort following surgical placement of orthodontic anchoring units and premolar extraction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Feldmann I; List T; Feldmann H; Bondemark L
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jul; 77(4):578-85. PubMed ID: 17605489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in premolar extraction therapy in adolescents.
    Garfinkle JS; Cunningham LL; Beeman CS; Kluemper GT; Hicks EP; Kim MO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):642-53. PubMed ID: 18456137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expectations, acceptance, and preferences regarding microimplant treatment in orthodontic patients: A randomized controlled trial.
    Baxmann M; McDonald F; Bourauel C; Jäger A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):250.e1-250.e10; discussion 250-1. PubMed ID: 20816284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of stability between delayed versus immediately loaded orthodontic palatal implants.
    Jackson A; Lemke R; Hatch J; Salome N; Gakunga P; Cochran D
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 18533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods.
    Skeggs RM; Benson PE; Dyer F
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD005098. PubMed ID: 17636785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients' perceptions regarding microimplant as anchorage in orthodontics.
    Lee TC; McGrath CP; Wong RW; Rabie AB
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Mar; 78(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 18251610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical observations and success rates of palatal implants.
    Asscherickx K; Vannet BV; Bottenberg P; Wehrbein H; Sabzevar MM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 20122439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
    Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is anchorage reinforcement with implants effective in orthodontics?
    Kalha AS
    Evid Based Dent; 2008; 9(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 18364687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early healing events following placement of a palatal subperiosteal orthodontic anchor: a pilot study.
    Hoffmann O; Suh YI; Caruso J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 16955615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Bone anchorage in orthodontics. A review].
    Livas C; Renkema AM; Kiliaridis S; Katsaros C
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2006 Mar; 113(3):96-100. PubMed ID: 16566399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of miniplates and teeth for orthodontic anchorage.
    Kim S; Herring S; Wang IC; Alcalde R; Mak V; Fu I; Huang G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):189.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18249283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Success rate of palatal orthodontic implants: a prospective longitudinal study.
    Männchen R; Schätzle M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jul; 19(7):665-9. PubMed ID: 18492083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort.
    Kuroda S; Sugawara Y; Deguchi T; Kyung HM; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 17208101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Pavithranand A; Rajasigamani K; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):551-4. PubMed ID: 16627183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment.
    Zablocki HL; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):852-60. PubMed ID: 18538249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthodontic anchorage: a systematic review.
    Feldmann I; Bondemark L
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):493-501. PubMed ID: 16637733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.