114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18211194)
1. Modeling lexical decision: the form of frequency and diversity effects.
Adelman JS; Brown GD
Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):214-29. PubMed ID: 18211194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The rank hypothesis and lexical decision: a reply to Adelman and Brown (2008).
Murray WS; Forster KI
Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):240-52. PubMed ID: 18211198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence for an activation locus of the word-frequency effect in lexical decision.
Allen PA; Smith AF; Lien MC; Grabbe J; Murphy MD
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):713-21. PubMed ID: 16131244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis.
Murray WS; Forster KI
Psychol Rev; 2004 Jul; 111(3):721-56. PubMed ID: 15250781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.
Wagenmakers EJ; Steyvers M; Raaijmakers JG; Shiffrin RM; van Rijn H; Zeelenberg R
Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):332-67. PubMed ID: 15020215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sequential effects in the lexical decision task: the role of the item frequency of the previous trial.
Perea M; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):385-401. PubMed ID: 12745840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006).
Estes Z; Adelman JS
Emotion; 2008 Aug; 8(4):441-4; discussion 445-57. PubMed ID: 18729575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lexical access of function versus content words.
Segalowitz SJ; Lane KC
Brain Lang; 2000 Dec; 75(3):376-89. PubMed ID: 11112292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What determines the speed of lexical access: homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al. (2003).
Caramazza A; Bi Y; Costa A; Miozzo M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):278-82. PubMed ID: 14736312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.
Brysbaert M; New B
Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):977-90. PubMed ID: 19897807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization.
Jones MN; Johns BT; Recchia G
Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Jun; 66(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 22686160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task.
Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):301-14. PubMed ID: 15971693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.
White SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):205-23. PubMed ID: 18248149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phonological activation in anaphoric lexical access (ALA).
Simner J; Smyth R
Brain Lang; 1999 Jun 1-15; 68(1-2):40-5. PubMed ID: 10433737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect.
Taft M
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 May; 57(4):745-65. PubMed ID: 15204131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials.
Rabovsky M; Alvarez CJ; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1222():156-65. PubMed ID: 18585684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of acute exposure to a complex fragrance on lexical decision performance.
Gaygen DE; Hedge A
Chem Senses; 2009 Jan; 34(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 18829946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
