BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18211198)

  • 1. The rank hypothesis and lexical decision: a reply to Adelman and Brown (2008).
    Murray WS; Forster KI
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):240-52. PubMed ID: 18211198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling lexical decision: the form of frequency and diversity effects.
    Adelman JS; Brown GD
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):214-29. PubMed ID: 18211194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis.
    Murray WS; Forster KI
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jul; 111(3):721-56. PubMed ID: 15250781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
    Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence for an activation locus of the word-frequency effect in lexical decision.
    Allen PA; Smith AF; Lien MC; Grabbe J; Murphy MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):713-21. PubMed ID: 16131244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.
    Wagenmakers EJ; Steyvers M; Raaijmakers JG; Shiffrin RM; van Rijn H; Zeelenberg R
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):332-67. PubMed ID: 15020215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relation of phoneme discrimination, lexical access, and short-term memory: A case study and interactive activation account.
    Martin RC; Breedin SD; Damian MF
    Brain Lang; 1999 Dec; 70(3):437-82. PubMed ID: 10600229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary?
    Borowsky R; Besner D
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jan; 113(1):181-95; discussion 196-200. PubMed ID: 16478310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contextual diversity is a main determinant of word identification times in young readers.
    Perea M; Soares AP; ComesaƱa M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Sep; 116(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 23374607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006).
    Estes Z; Adelman JS
    Emotion; 2008 Aug; 8(4):441-4; discussion 445-57. PubMed ID: 18729575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization.
    Jones MN; Johns BT; Recchia G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Jun; 66(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 22686160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: an eye-movement study.
    Hutzler F; Conrad M; Jacobs AM
    Brain Lang; 2005 Feb; 92(2):138-52. PubMed ID: 15629488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: evidence from eye movements.
    Dahan D; Magnuson JS; Tanenhaus MK
    Cogn Psychol; 2001 Jun; 42(4):317-67. PubMed ID: 11368527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What determines the speed of lexical access: homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al. (2003).
    Caramazza A; Bi Y; Costa A; Miozzo M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):278-82. PubMed ID: 14736312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials.
    Rabovsky M; Alvarez CJ; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1222():156-65. PubMed ID: 18585684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing the multiple in the multiple read-out model of visual word recognition.
    De Moor W; Verguts T; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1502-8. PubMed ID: 16393060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: a decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic.
    Hilbig BE; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1296-305. PubMed ID: 19686022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of low-spatial frequencies in lexical decision and masked priming.
    Boden C; Giaschi D
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Apr; 69(3):580-91. PubMed ID: 19168272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.