These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18211257)

  • 1. Population-based standardization (PBS) of institutional cesarean delivery rates.
    Grünebaum A; Chervenak F; Skupski D
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 18211257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates: university versus community hospitals in Vermont.
    Whitsel AI; Capeless EC; Abel DE; Stuart GS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 11084561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
    DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean section rates among health professionals in Finland, 1990-2006.
    Hemminki E; Klemetti R; Gissler M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(10):1138-44. PubMed ID: 19707896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of obstetric care and risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates.
    Bailit JL; Love TE; Dawson NV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 194(2):402-7. PubMed ID: 16458637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stability of risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates over time.
    Bailit JL; Garrett JM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 190(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 14981380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stratified rates of cesarean sections and spontaneous vaginal deliveries. Data from five labor wards in Denmark--1996.
    Rasmussen OB; Pedersen BL; Wilken-Jensen C; Vejerslev LO
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar; 79(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 10716305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase the risk of instrumental and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women?
    Aneiros F; Vazquez M; Valiño C; Taboada M; Sabaté S; Otero P; Costa J; Carceller J; Vázquez R; Díaz-Vieito M; Rodríguez A; Alvarez J
    J Clin Anesth; 2009 Mar; 21(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 19329011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal age and the likelihood of a maternal request for cesarean delivery: a 5-year population-based study.
    Lin HC; Xirasagar S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):848-55. PubMed ID: 15746681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study.
    Tang CH; Wang HI; Hsu CS; Su HW; Chen MJ; Lin HC
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Oct; 6():246. PubMed ID: 17029640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cesarean delivery rates in adolescent pregnancy.
    Zeteroglu S; Sahin I; Gol K
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2005 Jun; 10(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 16147817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A survey of obstetric perianesthesia care unit standards.
    Wilkins KK; Greenfield ML; Polley LS; Mhyre JM
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1869-75. PubMed ID: 19448215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cesarean risk after successful external cephalic version: a matched, retrospective analysis.
    Clock C; Kurtzman J; White J; Chung JH
    J Perinatol; 2009 Feb; 29(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 19129796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of attending physician specialty with the cesarean delivery rate in the same patient population.
    Coco AS; Gates TJ; Gallagher ME; Horst MA
    Fam Med; 2000 Oct; 32(9):639-44. PubMed ID: 11039152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical case mix adjustment of cesarean delivery rates in U.S. military hospitals, 2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 15738031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do risk factors for elective cesarean section differ from those of cesarean section during labor in low risk pregnancies?
    Roman H; Blondel B; Bréart G; Goffinet F
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 18598118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association between rising professional liability insurance premiums and primary cesarean delivery rates.
    Murthy K; Grobman WA; Lee TA; Holl JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1264-9. PubMed ID: 18055719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patients presenting with birth plans: a case-control study of delivery outcomes.
    Deering SH; Zaret J; McGaha K; Satin AJ
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):884-7. PubMed ID: 17977160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
    Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.