BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18211311)

  • 1. A cost-effectiveness analysis of propofol versus midazolam for procedural sedation in the emergency department.
    Hohl CM; Nosyk B; Sadatsafavi M; Anis AH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Jan; 15(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 18211311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sedation and analgesia regimens during fracture manipulation in the pediatric emergency department.
    Pershad J; Todd K; Waters T
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2006 Oct; 22(10):729-36. PubMed ID: 17047473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pharmacoeconomic modeling of lorazepam, midazolam, and propofol for continuous sedation in critically ill patients.
    MacLaren R; Sullivan PW
    Pharmacotherapy; 2005 Oct; 25(10):1319-28. PubMed ID: 16185175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the effect of protocol-directed sedation with propofol vs. midazolam by nurses in intensive care: efficacy, haemodynamic stability and patient satisfaction.
    Huey-Ling L; Chun-Che S; Jen-Jen T; Shau-Ting L; Hsing-I C
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jun; 17(11):1510-7. PubMed ID: 18482144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety and clinical effectiveness of midazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review.
    Hohl CM; Sadatsafavi M; Nosyk B; Anis AH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Jan; 15(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18211306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dexmedetomidine versus standard care sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care: an economic evaluation.
    Turunen H; Jakob SM; Ruokonen E; Kaukonen KM; Sarapohja T; Apajasalo M; Takala J
    Crit Care; 2015 Feb; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 25887576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cost-minimization analysis of dexmedetomidine compared with midazolam for long-term sedation in the intensive care unit.
    Dasta JF; Kane-Gill SL; Pencina M; Shehabi Y; Bokesch PM; Wisemandle W; Riker RR
    Crit Care Med; 2010 Feb; 38(2):497-503. PubMed ID: 19789442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost of ICU sedation: comparison of empirical and controlled sedation methods.
    Costa J; Cabré L; Molina R; Carrasco G
    Clin Intensive Care; 1994; 5(5 Suppl):17-21. PubMed ID: 10150550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a comparison with midazolam.
    Rahman NH; Hashim A
    Emerg Med J; 2011 Oct; 28(10):861-5. PubMed ID: 21098799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Profiling adverse respiratory events and vomiting when using propofol for emergency department procedural sedation.
    Bell A; Treston G; McNabb C; Monypenny K; Cardwell R
    Emerg Med Australas; 2007 Oct; 19(5):405-10. PubMed ID: 17919212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized clinical trial of etomidate versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department.
    Miner JR; Danahy M; Moch A; Biros M
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Jan; 49(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 16997421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pharmacoeconomic assessment of propofol 2% used for prolonged sedation.
    Barrientos-Vega R; Sánchez-Soria MM; Morales-Garcia C; Cuena-Boy R; Castellano-Hernández M
    Crit Care Med; 2001 Feb; 29(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 11246312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparison of propofol and midazolam in sedation of mechanically-ventilated postoperative patients].
    Makino A; Miyake N; Yamasaki T; Murakawa T
    Masui; 2001 Oct; 50(10):1101-5. PubMed ID: 11712342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of differing sedation practice for upper endoscopic ultrasound using expert observational analysis of the procedural sedation.
    Trummel JM; Surgenor SD; Cravero JP; Gordon SR; Blike GT
    J Patient Saf; 2009 Sep; 5(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 19927048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficiency of different adjunct techniques for regional anesthesia.
    Pongraweewan O; Lertakyamanee J; Luangnateethep U; Pooviboonsuk P; Nanthaniran M; Sathanasaowapak P; Chainchop P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Mar; 88(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 15962646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized controlled trial on use of propofol alone versus propofol with midazolam, ketamine, and pentazocine "sedato-analgesic cocktail" for sedation during ERCP.
    Ong WC; Santosh D; Lakhtakia S; Reddy DN
    Endoscopy; 2007 Sep; 39(9):807-12. PubMed ID: 17703390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Procedural sedation for direct current cardioversion: a feasibility study between two management strategies in the emergency department.
    Stronati G; Capucci A; Dello Russo A; Adrario E; Carsetti A; Casella M; Donati A; Guerra F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Aug; 20(1):388. PubMed ID: 32842955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-dose ketamine in addition to propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department.
    Loh G; Dalen D
    Ann Pharmacother; 2007 Mar; 41(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 17341533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Procedural sedation of critically ill patients in the emergency department.
    Miner JR; Martel ML; Meyer M; Reardon R; Biros MH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Feb; 12(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 15692132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practice efficiency and economics: the case for rapid recovery sedation agents for colonoscopy in a screening population.
    Vargo JJ; Bramley T; Meyer K; Nightengale B
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2007 Jul; 41(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 17577116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.