These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18211579)
1. Assessing the effect of an antimicrobial wound dressing on biofilms. Percival SL; Bowler P; Woods EJ Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 18211579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visualisation of bacterial sequestration and bactericidal activity within hydrating Hydrofiber wound dressings. Newman GR; Walker M; Hobot JA; Bowler PG Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(7):1129-39. PubMed ID: 16120458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities. Hill KE; Malic S; McKee R; Rennison T; Harding KG; Williams DW; Thomas DW J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Jun; 65(6):1195-206. PubMed ID: 20378671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel in vitro flat-bed perfusion biofilm model for determining the potential antimicrobial efficacy of topical wound treatments. Thorn RM; Greenman J J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 107(6):2070-9. PubMed ID: 19548886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of topical negative pressure on wound biofilms using an in vitro wound model. Ngo QD; Vickery K; Deva AK Wound Repair Regen; 2012; 20(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 22126340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combinatorial activities of ionic silver and sodium hexametaphosphate against microorganisms associated with chronic wounds. Humphreys G; Lee GL; Percival SL; McBain AJ J Antimicrob Chemother; 2011 Nov; 66(11):2556-61. PubMed ID: 21873289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antimicrobial efficacy of the silver wound dressing Biatain Ag in a disc carrier test simulating wound secretion. Ebert M; Assadian O; Hübner NO; Koburger T; Kramer A; ; Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2011; 24(6):337-41. PubMed ID: 21832866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of a solution containing citrate/Methylene Blue/parabens on Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and biofilm, and comparison with various heparin solutions. Sauer K; Steczko J; Ash SR J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 May; 63(5):937-45. PubMed ID: 19282330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of flow cytometry to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against planktonic Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Percival SL; Slone W; Linton S; Okel T; Corum L; Thomas JG Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 21518089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standardizing an in vitro procedure for the evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of wound dressings and the assessment of three wound dressings. Tkachenko O; Karas JA J Antimicrob Chemother; 2012 Jul; 67(7):1697-700. PubMed ID: 22514261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing. Scully R; Hurlow J; Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P J Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inhibitory efficacy of various antibiotics on matrix and viable mass of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Toté K; Berghe DV; Deschacht M; de Wit K; Maes L; Cos P Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2009 Jun; 33(6):525-31. PubMed ID: 19179053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antibacterial properties and reduction of MRSA biofilm with a dressing combining polyabsorbent fibres and a silver matrix. Desroche N; Dropet C; Janod P; Guzzo J J Wound Care; 2016 Oct; 25(10):577-584. PubMed ID: 27681588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo. Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High in vitro antimicrobial activity of synthetic antimicrobial peptidomimetics against staphylococcal biofilms. Flemming K; Klingenberg C; Cavanagh JP; Sletteng M; Stensen W; Svendsen JS; Flaegstad T J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Jan; 63(1):136-45. PubMed ID: 19010828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model. Lipp C; Kirker K; Agostinho A; James G; Stewart P J Wound Care; 2010 Jun; 19(6):220-6. PubMed ID: 20551862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of honey on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Alandejani T; Marsan J; Ferris W; Slinger R; Chan F Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 141(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 19559969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of internally validated Suleman L; Purcell L; Thomas H; Westgate S J Wound Care; 2020 Mar; 29(3):154-161. PubMed ID: 32160088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro test of the efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in simulated wound fluid. Said J; Dodoo CC; Walker M; Parsons D; Stapleton P; Beezer AE; Gaisford S Int J Pharm; 2014 Feb; 462(1-2):123-8. PubMed ID: 24374221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]