These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18211868)

  • 1. Wild pedigrees: the way forward.
    Pemberton JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Mar; 275(1635):613-21. PubMed ID: 18211868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating Inbreeding Rates in Natural Populations: Addressing the Problem of Incomplete Pedigrees.
    Miller MP; Haig SM; Ballou JD; Steel EA
    J Hered; 2017 Jul; 108(5):574-582. PubMed ID: 28398480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genome-wide estimates of coancestry and inbreeding in a closed herd of ancient Iberian pigs.
    Saura M; Fernández A; Rodríguez MC; Toro MA; Barragán C; Fernández AI; Villanueva B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e78314. PubMed ID: 24205195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pedigrees and microsatellites among endangered ungulates: what do they tell us?
    Ruiz-López MJ; Roldán ER; Espeso G; Gomendio M
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1352-64. PubMed ID: 19368643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molecular and pedigree measures of relatedness provide similar estimates of inbreeding depression in a bottlenecked population.
    Townsend SM; Jamieson IG
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 23496652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs.
    Santure AW; Stapley J; Ball AD; Birkhead TR; Burke T; Slate J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1439-51. PubMed ID: 20149098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Introduction. Evolutionary dynamics of wild populations: the use of long-term pedigree data.
    Kruuk LE; Hill WG
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Mar; 275(1635):593-6. PubMed ID: 18211885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal.
    Wells DA; Cant MA; Nichols HJ; Hoffman JI
    Mol Ecol; 2018 May; 27(9):2271-2288. PubMed ID: 29603504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relevance of pedigrees in the conservation genomics era.
    Galla SJ; Brown L; Couch-Lewis Ngāi Tahu Te Hapū O Ngāti Wheke Ngāti Waewae Y; Cubrinovska I; Eason D; Gooley RM; Hamilton JA; Heath JA; Hauser SS; Latch EK; Matocq MD; Richardson A; Wold JR; Hogg CJ; Santure AW; Steeves TE
    Mol Ecol; 2022 Jan; 31(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 34553796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring individual inbreeding in the age of genomics: marker-based measures are better than pedigrees.
    Kardos M; Luikart G; Allendorf FW
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Jul; 115(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 26059970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history.
    Robinson SP; Simmons LW; Kennington WJ
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(23):5779-92. PubMed ID: 24102888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accounting for genetic differences among unknown parents in microevolutionary studies: how to include genetic groups in quantitative genetic animal models.
    Wolak ME; Reid JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Jan; 86(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 27731502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The imprecision of heterozygosity-fitness correlations hinders the detection of inbreeding and inbreeding depression in a threatened species.
    Grueber CE; Waters JM; Jamieson IG
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Jan; 20(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 21087447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inbreeding depression influences lifetime breeding success in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus).
    Slate J; Kruuk LE; Marshall TC; Pemberton JM; Clutton-Brock TH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Aug; 267(1453):1657-62. PubMed ID: 11467429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.
    Csilléry K; Johnson T; Beraldi D; Clutton-Brock T; Coltman D; Hansson B; Spong G; Pemberton JM
    Genetics; 2006 Aug; 173(4):2091-101. PubMed ID: 16783017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative trait locus analysis of hybrid pedigrees: variance-components model, inbreeding parameter, and power.
    Svischeva GR
    BMC Genet; 2007 Jul; 8():50. PubMed ID: 17651509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marker-based estimation of the coefficient of coancestry in hybrid breeding programmes.
    Maenhout S; De Baets B; Haesaert G
    Theor Appl Genet; 2009 Apr; 118(6):1181-92. PubMed ID: 19224194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kinship-based management strategies for captive breeding programs when pedigrees are unknown or uncertain.
    Putnam AS; Ivy JA
    J Hered; 2014; 105(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24143031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of parasite transmission in promoting inbreeding: II. Pedigree reconstruction reveals sib-transmission and consequent kin-mating.
    Detwiler JT; Criscione CD
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Sep; 26(17):4405-4417. PubMed ID: 28626973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.