These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18211869)

  • 41. Estimation of changes in genetic parameters in selected lines of mice using REML with an animal model. 2. Body weight, body composition and litter size.
    Beniwal BK; Hastings IM; Thompson R; Hill WG
    Heredity (Edinb); 1992 Oct; 69 ( Pt 4)():361-71. PubMed ID: 1428953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. SelSim: a program to simulate population genetic data with natural selection and recombination.
    Spencer CC; Coop G
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3673-5. PubMed ID: 15271777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Bayesian framework for comparative quantitative genetics.
    Ovaskainen O; Cano JM; Merilä J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Mar; 275(1635):669-78. PubMed ID: 18211881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. LAMARC 2.0: maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation of population parameters.
    Kuhner MK
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(6):768-70. PubMed ID: 16410317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of sire misidentification on estimates of genetic parameters for birth and weaning weights in Hereford cattle.
    Senneke SL; MacNeil MD; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2307-12. PubMed ID: 15318729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Quantitative genetic analysis of natural populations.
    Moore AJ; Kukuk PF
    Nat Rev Genet; 2002 Dec; 3(12):971-8. PubMed ID: 12459727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Looking for Darwin in Genomic Sequences: Validity and Success Depends on the Relationship Between Model and Data.
    Jones CT; Susko E; Bielawski JP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1910():399-426. PubMed ID: 31278672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Are Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons for natural populations meaningful?
    Pujol B; Wilson AJ; Ross RI; Pannell JR
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Nov; 17(22):4782-5. PubMed ID: 19140971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Likelihood estimation of quantitative genetic parameters when selection occurs: models and problems.
    Gianola D; Fernando RL; Im S; Foulley JL
    Genome; 1989; 31(2):768-77. PubMed ID: 2632350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Effects of Population Size Histories on Estimates of Selection Coefficients from Time-Series Genetic Data.
    Jewett EM; Steinrücken M; Song YS
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Nov; 33(11):3002-3027. PubMed ID: 27550904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Impact of Selection, Gene Conversion, and Biased Sampling on the Assessment of Microbial Demography.
    Lapierre M; Blin C; Lambert A; Achaz G; Rocha EP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jul; 33(7):1711-25. PubMed ID: 26931140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A simple model of group selection that cannot be analyzed with inclusive fitness.
    van Veelen M; Luo S; Simon B
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Nov; 360():279-289. PubMed ID: 25034338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of genetic groups on estimates of additive genetic variance.
    Pieramati C; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Jan; 71(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 8454554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Application of an autoregressive process to estimate genetic parameters and breeding values for daily milk yield in a tropical herd of Lucerna cattle and in United States Holstein herds.
    Carvalheira JG; Blake RW; Pollak EJ; Quaas RL; Duran-Castro CV
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Oct; 81(10):2738-51. PubMed ID: 9812279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Directional selection in temporally replicated studies is remarkably consistent.
    Morrissey MB; Hadfield JD
    Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):435-42. PubMed ID: 22276539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Artificial selection and maintenance of genetic variance in the global dairy cow population.
    Brotherstone S; Goddard M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Jul; 360(1459):1479-88. PubMed ID: 16048790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of BLUE and BLUP/REML in the selection of clones and families of potato (Solanum tuberosum).
    Ticona-Benavente CA; da Silva Filho DF
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Dec; 14(4):18421-30. PubMed ID: 26782490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Coalescence 2.0: a multiple branching of recent theoretical developments and their applications.
    Tellier A; Lemaire C
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Jun; 23(11):2637-52. PubMed ID: 24750385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.