BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18212240)

  • 1. Lesion and patient characteristics associated with malignancy after a probably benign finding on community practice mammography.
    Lehman CD; Rutter CM; Eby PR; White E; Buist DS; Taplin SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):511-5. PubMed ID: 18212240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
    Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories.
    Bent CK; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Sayre JW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1378-83. PubMed ID: 20410428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Level of suspicion of a mammographic lesion: use of features defined by BI-RADS lexicon and correlation with large-core breast biopsy.
    Bérubé M; Curpen B; Ugolini P; Lalonde L; Ouimet-Oliva D
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1998 Aug; 49(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 9709675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms.
    Lehman C; Holt S; Peacock S; White E; Urban N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12076896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic characteristics and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) of non-palpable breast lesions.
    Ventrella V; Tufaro A; Zito FA; Addante M; Stea B; Dentamaro R; D'Amico C; Paradiso A
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):602-7. PubMed ID: 21565889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging and Histopathologic Features of BI-RADS 3 Lesions Upgraded during Imaging Surveillance.
    Michaels A; Chung CS; Birdwell RL; Frost EP; Giess CS
    Breast J; 2017 Jan; 23(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 27612001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Radiological features of breast cancer].
    Kettritz U
    Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 2005; 89():48-51. PubMed ID: 18035672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
    Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding--short interval follow-up suggested".
    Caplan LS; Blackman D; Nadel M; Monticciolo DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 9930778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic features of screening detected pT1 (a-b) invasive breast cancer using BI-RADS lexicon.
    Bargalló X; Santamaría G; Velasco M; del Amo M; Arguis P; Burrel M; Capurro S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2620-6. PubMed ID: 22206831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
    Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P
    Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency of Malignancy and Imaging Characteristics of Probably Benign Lesions Seen at Breast MRI.
    Grimm LJ; Anderson AL; Baker JA; Johnson KS; Walsh R; Yoon SC; Ghate SV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):442-7. PubMed ID: 26204298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concordance of BI-RADS Assessments and Management Recommendations for Breast MRI in Community Practice.
    Lee AY; Ichikawa L; Lee JM; Lee CI; DeMartini WB; Joe BN; Wernli KJ; Sprague BL; Herschorn SD; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 26700354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.
    Ha SM; Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1087):20170787. PubMed ID: 29658793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
    Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Focal Breast Lesions in Clinical CT Examinations of the Chest: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Krug KB; Houbois C; Grinstein O; Borggrefe J; Puesken M; Hanstein B; Malter W; Maintz D; Hellmich M
    Rofo; 2017 Oct; 189(10):977-989. PubMed ID: 28683503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive predictive value of breast cancer in the lesions categorized as BI-RADS category 5.
    Wiratkapun C; Lertsithichai P; Wibulpholprasert B
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Aug; 89(8):1253-9. PubMed ID: 17048437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.