117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18212241)
1. Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the sonographic and pathologic features.
Shin HJ; Kim HH; Kim SM; Kwon GY; Gong G; Cho OK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):516-25. PubMed ID: 18212241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yang WT; Tse GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jan; 182(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 14684521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features.
Mun HS; Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Kim H
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):e27-35. PubMed ID: 23177096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer.
Brennan ME; Turner RM; Ciatto S; Marinovich ML; French JR; Macaskill P; Houssami N
Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 21493791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation between sonographic findings and clinicopathologic and biologic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ in 691 patients.
Scoggins ME; Fox PS; Kuerer HM; Rauch GM; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Lari SA; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):878-88. PubMed ID: 25794082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography compared with conventional mammography.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Pfleiderer SO; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 19006771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sonographic findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ.
Lee MH; Ko EY; Han BK; Shin JH; Ko ES; Hahn SY
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Oct; 41(8):465-71. PubMed ID: 23949917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast carcinoma in situ in 167 women--incidence, mode of presentation, therapy and follow-up.
Ringberg A; Andersson I; Aspegren K; Linell F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Oct; 17(5):466-76. PubMed ID: 1657650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Park JS; Park YM; Kim EK; Kim SJ; Han SS; Lee SJ; In HS; Ryu JH
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1687-97. PubMed ID: 21098839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographically detected, clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation.
Solin LJ; McCormick B; Recht A; Haffty BG; Taylor ME; Kuske RR; Bornstein BA; McNeese M; Schultz DJ; Fowble BL; Barrett W; Yeh IT; Kurtz JM; Amalric R; Fourquet A
Cancer J Sci Am; 1996; 2(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 9166516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinicopathologic, mammographic, and sonographic features in 1,187 patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by estrogen receptor status.
Rauch GM; Kuerer HM; Scoggins ME; Fox PS; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Lari SA; Hobbs BP; Adrada BE; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(3):639-47. PubMed ID: 23774990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy.
Cheung YC; Wan YL; Chen SC; Lui KW; Ng SH; Yeow KM; Lee KF; Hsueh S
J Clin Ultrasound; 2002; 30(6):323-31. PubMed ID: 12116093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of sonography in the detection of contralateral metachronous breast cancer in an Asian population.
Kim MJ; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Park BW; Kim SI; Sohn J; Oh KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):476-80. PubMed ID: 18212235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic Features of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast With Microinvasion: Correlation With Clinicopathologic Findings and Biomarkers.
Yao JJ; Zhan WW; Chen M; Zhang XX; Zhu Y; Fei XC; Chen XS
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Oct; 34(10):1761-8. PubMed ID: 26324758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging features of micropapillary DCIS: correlation with clinical and histopathological findings.
Lee YS; Mathew J; Dogan BE; Resetkova E; Huo L; Yang WT
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jul; 18(7):797-803. PubMed ID: 21419669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up.
Mahoney MC; Robinson-Smith TM; Shaughnessy EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):949-54. PubMed ID: 16985141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
