These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation. Adunka OF; Buss E; Clark MS; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception. Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perception of speech by prelingual pre-adolescent and adolescent cochlear implant users. Shpak T; Koren L; Tzach N; Most T; Luntz M Int J Audiol; 2009 Nov; 48(11):775-83. PubMed ID: 19951145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users. Donaldson GS; Kreft HA Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants. Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults. Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems. Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users. Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing: comparison with cochlear implant users. Eisenberg LS; Kirk KI; Martinez AS; Ying EA; Miyamoto RT Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 15148177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources. Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]