285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18212731)
21. Continuous right ventricular end-diastolic volume in comparison with left ventricular end-diastolic area.
Della Rocca G; Costa MG; Coccia C; Pompei L; Salandin V; Pierangelo DM; Pietropaoli P
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 26(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 19276913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using respiratory variations in left ventricular stroke area by transoesophageal echocardiographic automated border detection in mechanically ventilated patients.
Cannesson M; Slieker J; Desebbe O; Farhat F; Bastien O; Lehot JJ
Crit Care; 2006; 10(6):R171. PubMed ID: 17163985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Clinical observation of passive leg raising combined with non invasive cardiac output monitoring system in predicting volume responsiveness].
Wang HL; Liu HT; Yu KJ
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2011 Mar; 23(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 21366942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the FloTrac uncalibrated continuous cardiac output system for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Mutoh T; Ishikawa T; Nishino K; Yasui N
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Jul; 21(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19542999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients.
Marik PE; Levitov A; Young A; Andrews L
Chest; 2013 Feb; 143(2):364-370. PubMed ID: 22910834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Passive leg raising predicts volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
Liu Y; Lu YH; Xie JF; Qiu XH; Dong L; Yang CS; Liu L; Yang Y; Qiu HB
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 49(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 21418837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can passive leg raising be used to guide fluid administration?
De Backer D
Crit Care; 2006; 10(6):170. PubMed ID: 17096869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness.
Charron C; Caille V; Jardin F; Vieillard-Baron A
Curr Opin Crit Care; 2006 Jun; 12(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 16672785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predictors of cardiac responsiveness to fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.
Heijmans JH; Ganushak YM; Theunissen MS; Maessen JG; Roekaerts PJ
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2010; 61(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 21268571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted?
Heenen S; De Backer D; Vincent JL
Crit Care; 2006; 10(4):R102. PubMed ID: 16846530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of fluid responsiveness with end-tidal carbon dioxide using a simplified passive leg raising maneuver: a prospective observational study.
Toupin F; Clairoux A; Deschamps A; Lebon JS; Lamarche Y; Lambert J; Fortier A; Denault AY
Can J Anaesth; 2016 Sep; 63(9):1033-41. PubMed ID: 27307176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hemodynamic-volumetric monitoring.
Della Rocca G; Costa MG
Minerva Anestesiol; 2004 Apr; 70(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 15173701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Global end-diastolic volume during different loading conditions in a pediatric animal model.
Renner J; Meybohm P; Gruenewald M; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Boening A; Bein B
Anesth Analg; 2007 Nov; 105(5):1243-9, table of contents. PubMed ID: 17959950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of elevated PEEP on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in a pediatric animal model.
Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Hedderich J; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 18(12):1170-7. PubMed ID: 19076570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fluid therapy in acute myocardial infarction: evaluation of predictors of volume responsiveness.
Snygg J; Bech-Hanssen O; Lönn L; Andersson B; Aneman A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Jan; 53(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19032557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Acute heart failure: diagnosis and monitoring].
Janssens U
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Jun; 134(24):1287-92. PubMed ID: 19499501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. What is a fluid challenge?
Cecconi M; Parsons AK; Rhodes A
Curr Opin Crit Care; 2011 Jun; 17(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 21508838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Variation in amplitude of central venous pressure curve induced by respiration is a useful tool to reveal fluid responsiveness in postcardiac surgery patients.
Westphal GA; Silva E; Caldeira Filho M; Roman Gonçalves AR; Poli-de-Figueiredo LF
Shock; 2006 Aug; 26(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 16878021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Automated pre-ejection period variation indexed to tidal volume predicts fluid responsiveness after cardiac surgery.
Vistisen ST; Struijk JJ; Larsson A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Apr; 53(4):534-42. PubMed ID: 19239409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pressures on parameters of fluid responsiveness.
Sakka SG; Becher L; Kozieras J; van Hout N
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 26(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 19401662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
